Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30993543›Full record

ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2019

Interaction between phytotherapy and oral anticancer agents: prospective study and literature review.

Anne-Laure Clairet, Marie Boiteux-Jurain, Elsa Curtit, Marie Jeannin, Blandine Gérard, Virginie Nerich, Samuel Limat

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Impact of the ONCORAL multidisciplinary city-hospital follow-up on older patients with cancer treated with oral anticancer drugs.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. A pre-post evaluation of oncology healthcare providers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices following the implementation of a complementary medicine practice guideline.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  17. Adverse events of targeted therapies approved for women's cancers.International journal of women's dermatology · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anne-Laure ClairetDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France.
Marie Boiteux-JurainDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France.
Elsa CurtitUniv. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR1098, Interactions Hôte-Greffon-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire et Génique, 25000, Besançon, France.
Marie JeanninDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France.
Blandine GérardDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France.
Virginie NerichDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France. v1nerich@chu-besancon.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0351-6040
Samuel LimatDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Besançon, 25000, Besançon, France.
Inserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is becoming more prevalent in elderly patient. Due to polypharmacy, older adults with cancer are predisposed to drug-drug interactions. There is also an increasing interest in the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Thirty to seventy percent of patients with cancer have used CAM. Through pharmaceutical counseling sessions, we can provide advices on herb-drug interactions (HDI). All the patients seen in pharmaceutical counseling sessions were prospectively included. Information was collected during these sessions: prescribed medication (oral anticancer agents (OAA) and other drugs), CAM (phytotherapy especially), and use of over-the-counter (OTC) drugs. If pharmacist considered an interaction or an intervention clinically relevant, the oncologist was notified. Then, a literature review was realized to identify the potential HDI (no interactions, precautions for use, contraindication). Among 201 pharmacist counseling sessions, it resulted in 104 interventions related to 46 HDI, 28 drug-drug interactions and 30 others (wrong dosage, omission…). To determine HDI, we review 73 medicinal plants which are used by our patients with cancer and 31 OAA. A total of 1829 recommendations were formulated about 59 (75%) medical plants and their interaction with an OAA. Herb-drug interactions should not be ignored by healthcare providers in their management of cancer patients in daily practice.

Indexed as

Herb-Drug InteractionsPolypharmacyAgedAntineoplastic AgentsHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNonprescription DrugsPharmacistsPhytotherapyPlant PreparationsProspective StudiesAntineoplastic AgentsNonprescription DrugsPlant PreparationsHerb–drug interactionsOncologyOral anticancer agentsPhytotherapy

Identifiers

PMID30993543
OpenAlexW2936909746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.