Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30993504›Full record

ArticlePhotosynthesis research2019

Effects of excess light energy on excitation-energy dynamics in a pennate diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum.

Ryo Nagao, Yoshifumi Ueno, Makio Yokono, Jian-Ren Shen, Seiji Akimoto

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Photosynthesis research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Spectroscopic Investigation of the In Vivo Light-Dependent Photodynamics of the Marine Diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum.Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Dynamic Analysis of ChlorophyllPlant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Fucoxanthin ChlorophyllFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effects of COPhotosynthesis research · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ryo NagaoResearch Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama, 700-8530, Japan. nagaoryo@okayama-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8212-3001
Yoshifumi UenoGraduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, 657-8501, Japan.
Makio YokonoNippon Flour Mills Co., Ltd, Innovation Center, Atsugi, 243-0041, Japan.
Jian-Ren ShenResearch Institute for Interdisciplinary Science and Graduate School of Natural Science and Technology, Okayama University, Okayama, 700-8530, Japan.
Seiji AkimotoGraduate School of Science, Kobe University, Kobe, 657-8501, Japan. akimoto@hawk.kobe-u.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Controlling excitation energy flow is a fundamental ability of photosynthetic organisms to keep a better performance of photosynthesis. Among the organisms, diatoms have unique light-harvesting complexes, fucoxanthin chlorophyll (Chl) a/c-binding proteins. We have recently investigated light-adaptation mechanisms of a marine centric diatom, Chaetoceros gracilis, by spectroscopic techniques. However, it remains unclear how pennate diatoms regulate excitation energy under different growth light conditions. Here, we studied light-adaptation mechanisms in a marine pennate diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum grown at 30 µmol photons m

Indexed as

LightChlorophyllDiatomsOxygenSpectrometry, FluorescenceTime FactorsChlorophyllOxygenFCPLow-energy ChlPennate diatomPhotoinhibitionTime-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.