ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2019
Multimodality Imaging for the Assessment of Pericardial Diseases.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Emerging Role of Multimodality Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management of Post Pericardiotomy Syndrome.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Pericarditis recurrence is associated with milder electrocardiographic, echocardiographic, and laboratory findings.Internal and emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Advanced Cardiac Imaging and Women's Chest Pain: A Question of Gender.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Cardiac tamponade.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023Review
- The role of multi-modality cardiovascular imaging in a patient presenting with acute liver failure secondary to constrictive pericarditis: a case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2022Article
- Parametric mapping CMR for the measurement of inflammatory reactions of the pericardium.Open heart · 2022Article
- Is the heart involved or not? The diagnostic value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of non-cardiac malignancies and metastatic cardiac tumours.BJR case reports · 2022Article
- Established and Emerging Techniques for Pericardial Imaging with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.Current cardiology reports · 2021Review
- Review
- Pericardial Diseases in COVID19: a Contemporary Review.Current cardiology reports · 2021Review
- Diagnosis and treatment of effusive-constrictive pericarditis: a case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2021Article
- Constrictive Pericarditis: An Update on Noninvasive Multimodal Diagnosis.Journal of cardiovascular echographyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThe diagnosis of pericardial syndromes, while occasionally straightforward, includes a wide range of pathologies and is often a well-recognized clinical challenge. The aim of this review is to highlight the key role of the various imaging modalities for the diagnosis and management of the spectrum of pericardial diseases. RECENT
findingsCardiac imaging has become an integral part of the diagnostic process often beginning with echocardiography and supported by advanced imaging modalities including computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positive emission tomography. These modalities go beyond the simple identification of the pericardium, to identifying increased pericardial thickness, active pericardial edema and inflammation, and its effect on cardiac hemodynamics. Multimodality imaging has significantly facilitated the diagnosis and long-term management of patients with pericardial diseases. The role of these imaging modalities in overall prognosis and prevention remains to be investigated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.