Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30993080›Full record

ArticleJournal of biological research (Thessalonike, Greece)2019

A systematic simulation-based meta-analytical framework for prediction of physiological biomarkers in alopecia.

Syed Aun Muhammad, Nighat Fatima, Rehan Zafar Paracha, Amjad Ali, Jake Y Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biological research (Thessalonike, Greece), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Computational tools for modern vaccine development.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Syed Aun Muhammad1Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, 60800 Pakistan.
Nighat Fatima2Department of Pharmacy, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Abbottabad, 22060 Pakistan.
Rehan Zafar Paracha3Research Center of Modeling and Simulation (RCMS), Department of Computational Sciences, National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, 44000 Pakistan.
Amjad Ali4Atta-ur-Rahman School of Applied Biosciences (ASAB), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, 44000 Pakistan.
Jake Y Chen5Informatics Institute, School of Medicine, The University of Alabama (UAB), Birmingham, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlopecia or hair loss is a complex polygenetic and psychologically devastating disease affecting millions of men and women globally. Since the gene annotation and environmental knowledge is limited for alopecia, a systematic analysis for the identification of candidate biomarkers is required that could provide potential therapeutic targets for hair loss therapy.

resultsWe designed an interactive framework to perform a meta-analytical study based on differential expression analysis, systems biology, and functional proteomic investigations. We analyzed eight publicly available microarray datasets and found 12 potential candidate biomarkers including three extracellular proteins from the list of differentially expressed genes with a

conclusionOur integrative approach helps to prioritize the biomarkers that ultimately lessen the economic burden of experimental studies. It will also be valuable to discover mutants in genomic data in order to increase the identification of new biomarkers for similar problems.

Indexed as

AlopeciaBiomarkersFunctional genomicsMeta-analysisPPI networks

Identifiers

PMID30993080
PMCPMC6449998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.