Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30993062›Full record

ReviewTaiwan journal of ophthalmology

Intraocular lens correction of presbyopia.

Rebecca Sieburth, Ming Chen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Taiwan journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04652037 (Visual Outcomes and Rotational Stability of the Acrysof IQ Vivity Toric Extended Vision Intraocular Lens), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04652037 nacompletednot on this map

Visual Outcomes and Rotational Stability of the Acrysof IQ Vivity Toric Extended Vision Intraocular Lens

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)Ran2021 to 2022Enrolled20ConditionsCataract, Presbyopia, Corneal AstigmatismArmsAcrysof IQ Vivity Toric Extended Vision Intraocular Lens Implantation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Surgical interventions for presbyopia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Clinical outcomes with an aspheric monofocal and a new enhanced monofocal intraocular lens with modified optical profile.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Defocus Curve of Emerging Presbyopic Patients.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. IRISClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023
    Article
  16. Geometric-phase intraocular lenses with multifocality.Light, science & applications · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rebecca SieburthDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Ming ChenClinical Professor, John A Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawaii, Hawaii, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The continued development of intraocular lens (IOL) technology has led to a dramatic improvement in refractive outcomes. New and innovative ways of achieving the desired postoperative refractive goals continue to be developed. This article aims to review the currently available IOL modalities for correction of presbyopia at the time of cataract surgery, including reference to high-quality comparative studies, where available, and discussion of strengths as well as limitations of the currently available IOL technologies. It has been shown that multifocal compared to monofocal IOL was associated with higher rates of spectacle independence, but higher rates and severity of symptomatic glare as well as reduced contrast sensitivity. Within multifocal IOLs, diffractive compared to refractive IOLs tended to have better near vision and a lower rate of symptomatic glare. Extended depth-of-focus IOLs compared to diffractive multifocal IOL demonstrated equal or superior intermediate visual acuity, with less than or equal rates of glare. Accommodative IOLs represent a broad range of technologies that continue to develop, and new technologies offering opportunities for postoperative adjustment of refractive outcome are emerging.

Indexed as

Accommodative intraocular lenscataract surgeryextended depth-of-focus intraocular lensintraocular lensintraocular lens technologylensmultifocal intraocular lenspremium cataract surgerypresbyopia correctionrefractive cataract surgery

Identifiers

PMID30993062
PMCPMC6432854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.