Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30992298›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2019

Comparative Analysis of AR Variant AR-V567es mRNA Detection Systems Reveals Eminent Variability and Questions the Role as a Clinical Biomarker in Prostate Cancer.

Christof Bernemann, Verena Humberg, Barbara Thielen, Julie Steinestel, Xin Chen, Stefan Duensing, Andres J Schrader, Martin Boegemann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. AR Structural Variants and Prostate Cancer.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christof BernemannDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany. christof.bernemann@ukmuenster.de.
Verena HumbergDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Barbara ThielenDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Julie SteinestelDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Xin ChenMolecular Urooncology, Department of Urology, University of Heidelberg School of Medicine, Heidelberg, Germany.
Stefan DuensingMolecular Urooncology, Department of Urology, University of Heidelberg School of Medicine, Heidelberg, Germany.
Andres J SchraderDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Martin BoegemannDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAndrogen receptor splice variants are known to facilitate resistance of prostate cancer cells toward antihormonal therapies. However, detection of the most prominent variant, AR-V7, on its own, is not sufficiently accurate for prediction of response. Thus, simultaneous detection of other variants might improve prediction. AR-V567es has been shown to be expressed in late stages of prostate cancer. Yet, there have been discrepant results regarding incidence of AR-V567es. We therefore aimed to perform a comprehensive comparison of different detection approaches for AR-V567es mRNA. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe compared a custom-made, probe-based PCR assay with 6 published AR-V567es detection PCR assays in distinct samples, that is, cancer cell lines, LuCaP xenografts, primary and metastatic tumor samples, and circulating tumor cells (CTC).

resultsUsing distinct approaches, we concordantly detected expression of AR-V567es in only three of 45 samples (LuCaP xenografts 86.2 and 136s2 as well as one CTC sample). We observed varying results in all other samples. Specificity analysis displayed nonspecific binding of 5 previously published PCR assays to AR full-length mRNA in the absence of AR-V567es.

conclusionsValidation of biomarker detection approaches is one of the most critical steps before transfer into clinical application. By performing comparative analysis of different detection approaches, we revealed eminent variability among previously described systems. Furthermore, we demonstrate an overestimation of AR-V567es in prostate cancer, presumably due to nonspecific detection of AR-FL mRNA. Therefore, any correlation between AR-V567es expression and clinical responses is highly doubtful and does not reflect the biological nature of the disease.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorGenetic HeterogeneityMutationAnimalsCell Line, TumorDisease Models, AnimalGene ExpressionHeterograftsHumansMaleMiceProstatic NeoplasmsReceptors, AndrogenRNA, MessengerRNA SplicingAR protein, humanBiomarkers, TumorReceptors, AndrogenRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.