Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30992085›Full record

ReviewJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2019

Immunogenicity of immunomodulatory, antibody-based, oncology therapeutics.

Jasmine Davda, Paul Declerck, Siwen Hu-Lieskovan, Timothy P Hickling, Ira A Jacobs, Jeffrey Chou, Shahram Salek-Ardakani, Eugenia Kraynov

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 171 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Biologic immunomodulators and spinal fusion: evidence, mechanisms, and perioperative considerations.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jasmine DavdaPfizer, San Diego, CA, USA.
Paul DeclerckUniversity of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Siwen Hu-LieskovanDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Timothy P HicklingPfizer, Andover, MA, USA.
Ira A JacobsPfizer, 219 East 42nd Street, New York, NY, 10017-5755, USA. ira.jacobs@pfizer.com.
Jeffrey ChouPfizer, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Shahram Salek-ArdakaniPfizer, San Diego, CA, USA.
Eugenia KraynovPfizer, San Diego, CA, USA.
Pfizer (United States) · USKU Leuven · BEUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing use of multiple immunomodulatory (IMD) agents for cancer therapies (e.g. antibodies targeting immune checkpoints, bispecific antibodies, and chimeric antigen receptor [CAR]-T cells), is raising questions on their potential immunogenicity and effects on treatment. In this review, we outline the mechanisms of action (MOA) of approved, antibody-based IMD agents, potentially related to their immunogenicity, and discuss the reported incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) as well as their clinical relevance in patients with cancer. In addition, we discuss the impact of the administration route and potential strategies to reduce the incidence of ADA and manage treated patients. Analysis of published reports indicated that the risk of immunogenicity did not appear to correlate with the MOA of anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1)/PD-ligand 1 monoclonal antibodies nor to substantially affect treatment with most of these agents in the majority of patients evaluated to date. Treatment with B-cell depleting agents appears associated with a low risk of immunogenicity. No significant difference in ADA incidence was found between the intravenous and subcutaneous administration routes for a panel of non-oncology IMD antibodies. Additionally, while the data suggest a higher likelihood of immunogenicity for antibodies with T-cell or antigen-presenting cell (APC) targets versus B-cell targets, it is possible to have targets expressed on APCs or T cells and still have a low incidence of immunogenicity.

Indexed as

Antibodies, BispecificAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenHumansImmune System DiseasesImmunosuppressive AgentsImmunotherapy, AdoptiveIncidenceLymphocyte DepletionNeoplasmsProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorReceptors, Chimeric AntigenTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, BispecificAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalB7-H1 AntigenCD274 protein, humanImmunosuppressive AgentsPDCD1 protein, humanProgrammed Cell Death 1 ReceptorReceptors, Chimeric AntigenADAAntibodyCTLA-4ImmunogenicityImmunomodulatoryNeutralizing antibodiesPD-1/PD-L1

Identifiers

PMID30992085
PMCPMC6466770
OpenAlexW2946033191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.