Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30991975›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019

Spatial and temporal trends of cesarean deliveries in Uganda: 2012-2016.

Emily B Atuheire, Denis Nixon Opio, Daniel Kadobera, Alex R Ario, Joseph K B Matovu, Julie Harris, Lilian Bulage, Blandina Nakiganda, Nazarius Mbona Tumwesigye, Bao-Ping Zhu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Emily B AtuheireUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, P.O. Box 7272, Kampala, Uganda. eatuheire@musph.ac.ug.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9015-3582
Denis Nixon OpioUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, P.O. Box 7272, Kampala, Uganda.
Daniel KadoberaUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, P.O. Box 7272, Kampala, Uganda.
Alex R ArioUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, P.O. Box 7272, Kampala, Uganda.
Joseph K B MatovuMakerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Julie HarrisUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA.
Lilian BulageUganda Public Health Fellowship Program, P.O. Box 7272, Kampala, Uganda.
Blandina NakigandaReproductive Health Division, Ministry of Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Nazarius Mbona TumwesigyeMakerere University School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda.
Bao-Ping ZhuUS Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Kampala, Uganda.
Frank KaharuzaAfrican Field Epidemiology Network, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

Research Mentoring and Building Capacity of underrepresented Minority Research Scientists in India.D43TW010540 · FIC · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MICHELE BARRY, Eva Harris · 2017 to 2026
$15.5M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW010540
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCesarean section (CS) is an important intervention in complicated births when the safety of the mother or baby is compromised. Despite worldwide concerns about the overutilization of CS in recent years, many African women and their newborns still die because of limited or no access to CS services. We evaluated temporal and spatial trends in CS births in Uganda and modeled future trends to inform programming.

methodsWe performed secondary analysis of total births data from the Uganda National Health Management Information System (HMIS) reports during 2012-2016. We reviewed data from 3461 health facilities providing basic, essential obstetric and emergency obstetric care services in all 112 districts. We defined facility-based CS rate as the proportion of cesarean deliveries among total live births in facilities, and estimated the population-based CS rate using the total number of cesarean deliveries as a proportion of annual expected births (including facility-based and non-facility-based) for each district. We predicted CS rates for 2021 using Generalised Linear Models with Poisson family, Log link and Unbiased Sandwich Standard errors. We used cesarean deliveries as the dependent variable and calendar year as the independent variable.

resultsCesarean delivery rates increased both at facility and population levels in Uganda. Overall, the CS rate for live births at facilities was 9.9%, increasing from 8.5% in 2012 to 11% in 2016. The overall population-based CS rate was 4.7%, and increased from 3.2 to 5.9% over the same period. Health Centre IV level facilities had the largest annual rate of increase in CS rate between 2012 and 2016. Among all 112 districts, 80 (72%) had a population CS rate below 5%, while 38 (34%) had a CS rate below 1% over the study period. Overall, Uganda's facility-based CS rate is projected to increase by 36% (PRR 1.36, 95% CI 1.35-1.36) in 2021 while the population-based CS rate is estimated to have doubled (PRR 2.12, 95% CI 2.11-2.12) from the baseline in 2016.

conclusionCesarean deliveries are increasing in Uganda. Health center IVs saw the largest increases in CS, and while there was regional heterogeneity in changes in CS rates, utilization of CS services is inadequate in most districts. We recommend expansion of CS services to improve availability.

Indexed as

AdultCesarean SectionFemaleHealth FacilitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal Health ServicesMedical OverusePregnancySpatio-Temporal AnalysisUgandaYoung AdultCesarean deliveriesCesarean section rateTrendsUganda

Identifiers

PMID30991975
PMCPMC6469217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.