ArticleBMC psychiatry2019
Recovery-focused mental health care planning and co-ordination in acute inpatient mental health settings: a cross national comparative mixed methods study.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A qualitative meta-synthesis of service users' and carers' experiences of assessment and involuntary hospital admissions under mental health legislations: a five-year update.BMC psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Mental health professionals' perceived barriers and enablers to shared decision-making in risk assessment and risk management: a qualitative systematic review.BMC psychiatry · 2021Pooled it
- Effective nurse-patient relationships in mental health care: A systematic review of interventions to improve the therapeutic alliance.International journal of nursing studies · 2020Pooled it
- Experiences of Suicidality Following Discharge From a Mental Health Inpatient Unit: A Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.Clinical psychology & psychotherapyPooled it
- Trial
- Patient Experiences of a Recovery-Oriented Nursing Programme in Inpatient Psychiatric Care: A Qualitative Study.Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing · 2026Article
- Life History, Identity, and Recovery in People with Mental Health Conditions: A Phenomenological Study Using OPHI-II.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- How is the in-patient psychiatric ward round understood in research literature? Scoping review.BJPsych bulletin · 2025Review
- Collaborative Practices in Mental Health Care: A Concept Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- How are the Spiritual Resources and Needs of Mental Health Consumers Identified and Documented by Staff upon Admission to an Australian Mental Health Service? A Mixed Methods Study.Journal of religion and health · 2025Article
- Understanding organisational and nursing behaviour changes associated with a therapeutic engagement improvement tool in acute mental health inpatient settings: A qualitative analysis.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2024Article
- Becoming an Open Dialogue practitioner: a qualitative study of practitioners' training experiences and transitioning to practice.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- Introducing community-based mental health support in Serbia: A qualitative study on experiences and needs of long-term psychiatric users.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2024Article
- Barriers and enablers to shared decision-making in assessment and management of risk: A qualitative interview study with people using mental health services.PLOS mental health · 2024Article
- Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the therapeutic relationship assessment scale for nurses.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2023Article
- Perceptions of nurses working in mental health services regarding the recovery-oriented care approach: Findings from Africa.Nursing open · 2023Article
- Nurses' Perceptions on How Recovery-Oriented Mental Health Care Can Be Developed and Implemented.Nursing research and practice · 2023Article
- Development of the FORUM: a new patient and clinician reported outcome measure for forensic mental health services.Psychology, crime & law : PC & L · 2022Article
- Synthesis of the Evidence on What Works for Whom in Telemental Health: Rapid Realist Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2022Review
- "These are people just like us who can work": Overcoming clinical resistance and shifting views in the implementation of Individual Placement and Support (IPS).Administration and policy in mental health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInvolving mental health service users in planning and reviewing their care can help personalised care focused on recovery, with the aim of developing goals specific to the individual and designed to maximise achievements and social integration. We aimed to ascertain the views of service users, carers and staff in acute inpatient wards on factors that facilitated or acted as barriers to collaborative, recovery-focused care.
methodsA cross-national comparative mixed-methods study involving 19 mental health wards in six service provider sites in England and Wales. This included a survey using established standardised measures of service users (n = 301) and staff (n = 290) and embedded case studies involving interviews with staff, service users and carers (n = 76). Quantitative and qualitative data were analysed within and across sites using descriptive and inferential statistics, and framework method.
resultsFor service users, when recovery-oriented focus was high, the quality of care was rated highly, as was the quality of therapeutic relationships. For staff, there was a moderate correlation between recovery orientation and quality of therapeutic relationships, with considerable variability. Staff members rated the quality of therapeutic relationships higher than service users did. Staff accounts of routine collaboration contrasted with a more mixed picture in service user accounts. Definitions and understandings of recovery varied, as did views of hospital care in promoting recovery. Managing risk was a central issue for staff, and service users were aware of measures taken to keep them safe, although their involvement in discussions was less apparent.
conclusionsThere is positive practice within acute inpatient wards, with evidence of commitment to safe, respectful, compassionate care. Recovery ideas were evident but there remained ambivalence on their relevance to inpatient care. Service users were aware of efforts taken to keep them safe, but despite measures described by staff, they did not feel routinely involved in care planning or risk management decisions. Research on increasing therapeutic contact time, shared decision making in risk assessment and using recovery focused tools could further promote personalised and recovery-focused care planning. This paper arises from a larger study published by National Institute for Health Research (Simpson A, et al, Health Serv Deliv Res 5(26), 2017).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.