Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30991953›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2019

Endoscopic transpapillary drainage in disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome after acute pancreatitis and trauma: long-term outcomes in 31 patients.

Yan Chen, Yueping Jiang, Wei Qian, Qihong Yu, Yuanhang Dong, Huiyun Zhu, Feng Liu, Yiqi Du, Dong Wang, Zhaoshen Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yan ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Yueping JiangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Shandong, China.
Wei QianDepartment of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Qihong YuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Yuanhang DongDepartment of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Huiyun ZhuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Feng LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Yiqi DuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Dong WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China. medchwd@163.com.
Zhaoshen LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Center, Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China. medzsli@126.com.
Changhai Hospital · CNSecond Military Medical University · CNQingdao University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConventionally, disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome is treated surgically. Endoscopic management is associated with lesser morbidity and mortality than that observed with surgery and shows similar success rates. However, limited data are available in this context. We evaluated the efficacy of endotherapeutic management for this syndrome.

methodsWe prospectively obtained data of patients with disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome between September 2008 and January 2016. Demographic and clinical data were assessed, and factors affecting clinical outcomes were statistically analyzed.

resultsThirty-one patients underwent 40 endoscopic transpapillary procedures, and 1 patient developed an infection after prosthesis insertion. Etiological contributors to disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome were abdominal trauma (52%) and acute necrotizing pancreatitis (48%). The median interval between the appearance of pancreatic leaks and disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome was 6.6 months (range 0.5-84 months). The median follow-up after the last treatment procedure was 38 months (range 17-99 months). Patients with complete main pancreatic duct disruption in the body/tail showed a low risk of pancreatic atrophy (P = 0.009). This study highlighted the significant correlation between endoscopic transpapillary drainage and clinical success (P = 0.014).

conclusionsDisconnected pancreatic duct syndrome is not an uncommon sequel of pancreatic injury, and much of the delayed diagnosis is attributable to a lack of knowledge regarding this disease. Endoscopic transpapillary intervention with ductal stenting is an effective and safe treatment for this condition.

Indexed as

EndoscopyAbdominal InjuriesAdultAgedCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeDrainageFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfectionsMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic DiseasesPancreatic DuctsPancreatic FistulaPancreatitis, Acute NecrotizingAcute abdominal traumaAcute necrotizing pancreatitisEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyPancreatic fistula

Identifiers

PMID30991953
PMCPMC6469079
OpenAlexW2945248233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.