Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30991948›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2019

Acceptability of a lifelogging wearable camera in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a mixed-method study.

Olga Gelonch, Mireia Ribera, Núria Codern-Bové, Sílvia Ramos, Maria Quintana, Gloria Chico, Noemí Cerulla, Paula Lafarga, Petia Radeva, Maite Garolera

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Dementia Care, Fall Detection, and Ambient-Assisted Living Technologies Help Older Adults Age in Place: A Scoping Review.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Olga GelonchClinical Research Group for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Carretera Torrebonica, S/N, 08227, Terrassa, Spain.
Mireia RiberaDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Núria Codern-BovéTerrasa University School of Nursing and Occupational Therapy, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Terrassa, Spain.
Sílvia RamosAVAN Foundation, Sabadell, Spain.
Maria QuintanaClinical Research Group for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Carretera Torrebonica, S/N, 08227, Terrassa, Spain.
Gloria ChicoClinical Research Group for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Carretera Torrebonica, S/N, 08227, Terrassa, Spain.
Noemí CerullaClinical Research Group for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Carretera Torrebonica, S/N, 08227, Terrassa, Spain.
Paula LafargaAVAN Foundation, Sabadell, Spain.
Petia RadevaDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Maite GaroleraClinical Research Group for Brain, Cognition and Behavior, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Carretera Torrebonica, S/N, 08227, Terrassa, Spain. mgarolera@cst.cat.ORCID 0000-0001-7443-8249
Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa · ESUniversitat de Barcelona · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe main objective of this research was to evaluate the acceptance of technology based on a wearable lifelogging camera in a sample of older adults diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

methodsA mixed-method design was used, consisting of a self-report questionnaire, numerous images taken by users, and a series of focus group discussions. The patients were involved in an individualized training programme.

resultsNine MCI patients and their caregiver relatives were included. They showed good acceptance of the camera and downloaded an appropriate number of images on a daily basis. Perceived severity and ease of use were the main factors associated with the intention to use the device.

conclusionsOlder adults with MCI can become competent users of lifelogging wearable cameras with a good level of acceptance. Privacy concerns are outweighed by the potential benefits for memory. Limitations, strengths and implications for future research are discussed.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversCognitive DysfunctionFemaleFocus GroupsHealth ServicesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesWearable Electronic DevicesAcceptabilityLifeloggingMild cognitive impairmentMixed-method studyTechnology

Identifiers

PMID30991948
PMCPMC6469032
OpenAlexW2945465551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.