ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019
metamicrobiomeR: an R package for analysis of microbiome relative abundance data using zero-inflated beta GAMLSS and meta-analysis across studies using random effects models.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Meta-analysis of 16S rRNA microbial data identified alterations of the gut microbiota in COVID-19 patients during the acute and recovery phases.BMC microbiology · 2022Pooled it
- Diversity and compositional changes in the gut microbiota of wild and captive vertebrates: a meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2021Pooled it
- The composition of lung microbiome in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC microbiology · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Chitogel following endoscopic sinus surgery promotes a healthy microbiome and reduces postoperative infections.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2022Trial
- dGAMLSS: an exact, distributed algorithm to fit Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale, and Shape for privacy-preserving population reference charts.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Interactions between time on diet, antibiotic treatment, and liver abscess development on the fecal microbiome of beef cattle.Animal microbiome · 2025Article
- Revisiting microgenderome: detecting and cataloguing sexually unique and enriched species in human microbiomes.BMC biology · 2024Article
- Bayesian Modeling on Microbiome Data Analysis: Application to Subgingival Microbiome Study.Statistics in biosciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Fungicide ingestion reduces net energy gain and microbiome diversity of the solitary mason bee.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Unraveling the interplay between root exudates, microbiota, and rhizosheath formation in pearl millet.Microbiome · 2024Article
- Inference of microbial covariation networks using copula models with mixture margins.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Agaricus subrufescens fermented rye affects the development of intestinal microbiota, local intestinal and innate immunity in suckling-to-nursery pigs.Animal microbiome · 2023Article
- In vitro gut microbiome response to carbohydrate supplementation is acutely affected by a sudden change in diet.BMC microbiology · 2023Article
- Out of site, out of mind: Changes in feather moss phyllosphere microbiota in mine offsite boreal landscapes.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Data pre-processing for analyzing microbiome data - A mini review.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- A random effect regression based on the odd log-logistic generalized inverse Gaussian distribution.Journal of applied statistics · 2023Article
- Dynamic Alterations in the Respiratory Tract Microbiota of Patients with COVID-19 and its Association with Microbiota in the Gut.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Article
- Growth promotion and antibiotic induced metabolic shifts in the chicken gut microbiome.Communications biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe rapid growth of high-throughput sequencing-based microbiome profiling has yielded tremendous insights into human health and physiology. Data generated from high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons are often preprocessed into composition or relative abundance. However, reproducibility has been lacking due to the myriad of different experimental and computational approaches taken in these studies. Microbiome studies may report varying results on the same topic, therefore, meta-analyses examining different microbiome studies to provide consistent and robust results are important. So far, there is still a lack of implemented methods to properly examine differential relative abundances of microbial taxonomies and to perform meta-analysis examining the heterogeneity and overall effects across microbiome studies.
resultsWe developed an R package 'metamicrobiomeR' that applies Generalized Additive Models for Location, Scale and Shape (GAMLSS) with a zero-inflated beta (BEZI) family (GAMLSS-BEZI) for analysis of microbiome relative abundance datasets. Both simulation studies and application to real microbiome data demonstrate that GAMLSS-BEZI well performs in testing differential relative abundances of microbial taxonomies. Importantly, the estimates from GAMLSS-BEZI are log (odds ratio) of relative abundances between comparison groups and thus are analogous between microbiome studies. As such, we also apply random effects meta-analysis models to pool estimates and their standard errors across microbiome studies. We demonstrate the meta-analysis examples and highlight the utility of our package on four studies comparing gut microbiomes between male and female infants in the first six months of life.
conclusionsGAMLSS-BEZI allows proper examination of microbiome relative abundance data. Random effects meta-analysis models can be directly applied to pool comparable estimates and their standard errors to evaluate the overall effects and heterogeneity across microbiome studies. The examples and workflow using our 'metamicrobiomeR' package are reproducible and applicable for the analyses and meta-analyses of other microbiome studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.