Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30991933›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019

Channel catfish use higher coordination to capture prey than to swallow.

Aaron M Olsen, L Patricia Hernández, Ariel L Camp, Elizabeth L Brainerd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cranial kinematics and prey-type effects inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  2. Introduction: food processing and nutritional assimilation in animals.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Guide to Inverse Kinematic Marker-Guided Rotoscoping Using IK Solvers.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Practical Guide to MeasuringIntegrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. An XROMM Study of Food Transport and Swallowing in Channel Catfish.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aaron M Olsen1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University , Providence, RI , USA.
L Patricia Hernández2 Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University , Washington, DC , USA.
Ariel L Camp1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University , Providence, RI , USA.
Elizabeth L Brainerd1 Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Brown University , Providence, RI , USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When animals move they must coordinate motion among multiple parts of the musculoskeletal system. Different behaviours exhibit different patterns of coordination, however, it remains unclear what general principles determine the coordination pattern for a particular behaviour. One hypothesis is that speed determines coordination patterns as a result of differences in voluntary versus involuntary control. An alternative hypothesis is that the nature of the behavioural task determines patterns of coordination. Suction-feeding fishes have highly kinetic skulls and must coordinate the motions of over a dozen skeletal elements to draw fluid and prey into the mouth. We used a dataset of intracranial motions at five cranial joints in channel catfish ( Ictalurus punctatus), collected using X-ray reconstruction of moving morphology, to test whether speed or task best explained patterns of coordination. We found that motions were significantly more coordinated (by 20-29%) during prey capture than during prey transport, supporting the hypothesis that the nature of the task determines coordination patterns. We found no significant difference in coordination between low- and high-speed motions. We speculate that capture is more coordinated to create a single fluid flow into the mouth while transport is less coordinated so that the cranial elements can independently generate multiple flows to reposition prey. Our results demonstrate the benefits of both higher and lower coordination in animal behaviours and the potential of motion analysis to elucidate motor tasks.

Indexed as

DeglutitionPredatory BehaviorAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaIctaluridaeSkullanimal motionbiomechanicsmotion integrationmotor controlX-ray reconstruction of moving morphology

Identifiers

PMID30991933
PMCPMC6501926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.