Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30991913›Full record

SynthesisBiology letters2019

Who let the cats out? A global meta-analysis on risk of parasitic infection in indoor versus outdoor domestic cats ( Felis catus).

Kayleigh Chalkowski, Alan E Wilson, Christopher A Lepczyk, Sarah Zohdy

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Biology letters, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Microscopic and molecular identification ofOpen veterinary journal · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. From cats to cortex:Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Seroprevalence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  15. The Wildcat That Lives in Me: A Review on Free-Roaming Cats (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kayleigh Chalkowski1 School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University , Auburn, AL 36849 , USA.
Alan E Wilson2 School of Fisheries, Aquaculture, and Aquatic Sciences, Auburn University , Auburn, AL 36849 , USA.
Christopher A Lepczyk1 School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University , Auburn, AL 36849 , USA.
Sarah Zohdy1 School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University , Auburn, AL 36849 , USA.
Auburn University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parasitic infection risks in domestic animals may increase as a result of outdoor activities, often leading to transmission events to and from owners, other domestic animals and wildlife. Furthermore, outdoor access has not been quantified in domestic animals as a risk factor with respect to latitude or parasite transmission pathway. Cats are an ideal model to test parasitic infection risk in outdoor animals because there have been many studies analysing this risk factor in this species; and there is a useful dichotomy in cat ownership between indoor-only cats and those with outdoor access. Thus, we used meta-analysis to determine whether outdoor access is a significant risk factor for parasitic infection in domestic pet cats across 19 different pathogens including many relevant to human, domestic animal and wildlife health, such as Toxoplasma gondii and Toxocara cati. Cats with outdoor access were 2.77 times more likely to be infected with parasites than indoor-only cats. Furthermore, absolute latitude trended towards significance such that each degree increase in absolute latitude increased infection likelihood by 4%. Thus, restricting outdoor access can reduce the risk of parasitic infection in cats and reduce the risk of zoonotic parasite transmission, spillover to sympatric wildlife and negative impacts on feline health.

Indexed as

Cat DiseasesParasitesParasitic DiseasesToxoplasmaAnimalsAnimals, DomesticAnimals, WildCatsHumansfelidlatitudepathogenpettransmissionzoonotic

Identifiers

PMID30991913
PMCPMC6501354
OpenAlexW2939105722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.