Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30991733›Full record

ArticleNutrients2019

The Nature and Quality of Australian Supermarkets' Policies that can Impact Public Health Nutrition, and Evidence of their Practical Application: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Claire Elizabeth Pulker, Georgina S A Trapp, Jane Anne Scott, Christina Mary Pollard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Food Environment Assessment in Two Socioeconomic Contexts in Queensland, Australia.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Exploring Feeding Practices and Food Literacy in Parents with Young Children from Disadvantaged Areas.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Claire Elizabeth PulkerSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Kent Street, GPO Box U1987, Perth 6845, Western Australia, Australia. c.pulker@curtin.edu.au.
Georgina S A TrappTelethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, PO Box 855, West Perth 6872, Western Australia, Australia. gina.trapp@telethonkids.org.au.
Jane Anne ScottSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Kent Street, GPO Box U1987, Perth 6845, Western Australia, Australia. jane.scott@curtin.edu.au.
Christina Mary PollardSchool of Public Health, Curtin University, Kent Street, GPO Box U1987, Perth 6845, Western Australia, Australia. c.pollard@curtin.edu.au.

Funding

Healthway 24124National Health and Medical Research Council 1073233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving population diets is a public health priority, and calls have been made for corporations such as supermarkets to contribute. Supermarkets hold a powerful position within the food system, and one source of power is supermarket own brand foods (SOBFs). Many of the world's largest supermarkets have corporate social responsibility (CSR) policies that can impact public health, but little is known about their quality or practical application. This study examines the nature and quality of Australian supermarkets' CSR policies that can impact public health nutrition, and provides evidence of practical applications for SOBFs. A content analysis of CSR policies was conducted. Evidence of supermarkets putting CSR policies into practice was derived from observational audits of 3940 SOBFs in three large exemplar supermarkets (Coles, Woolworths, IGA) in Perth, Western Australia (WA). All supermarkets had some CSR policies that could impact public health nutrition; however, over half related to sustainability, and many lacked specificity. All supermarkets sold some nutritious SOBFs, using marketing techniques that made them visible. Findings suggest Australian supermarket CSR policies are not likely to adequately contribute to improving population diets or sustainability of food systems. Setting robust and meaningful targets, and improving transparency and specificity of CSR policies, would improve the nature and quality of supermarket CSR policies and increase the likelihood of a public health benefit.

Indexed as

CommerceDietFood IndustryFood SupplyNutritive ValuePolicyPublic HealthCross-Sectional StudiesDiet, HealthyFeeding BehaviorFoodHumansMarketingNutritional StatusSocial ResponsibilitySustainable Developmentcorporate social responsibilityenvironmental sustainabilityfood and nutrition policypublic health nutritionsupermarketsupermarket own brand

Identifiers

PMID30991733
PMCPMC6520865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.