Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30991417›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2019

Killer Meiotic Drive and Dynamic Evolution of the wtf Gene Family.

Michael T Eickbush, Janet M Young, Sarah E Zanders

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The evolutionary genomics of meiotic drive.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  3. Oocyte Kinetochores at the Nexus of Meiotic Drive and Segregation Fidelity.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  4. Evolutionary persistence and divergence of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Functional constraints ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. A meiotic driver hijacks an epigenetic reader to disrupt mitosis in noncarrier offspring.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. An egg sabotaging mechanism drives non-Mendelian transmission in mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Proliferation and dissemination of killer meiotic drive loci.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. TheeLife · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael T EickbushStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO.
Janet M YoungDivision of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
Sarah E ZandersStowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, MO.
Stowers Institute for Medical Research · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · US

Funding

Genetic Conflict Shapes Centromeres and HeterochromatinR01GM074108 · NIGMS · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI MALIK, HARMIT S. · 2005 to 2022
$6.1M
Models of Selfishness: Molecular and Evolutionary Analyses of the Wtf Meiotic DriversDP2GM132936 · NIGMS · STOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI ZANDERS, SARAH ELIZABETH · 2018 to 2018
$2.5M
Mechanisms of meiotic drive and the functional consequences of rapid genome evolutionR00GM114436 · NIGMS · STOWERS INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH · PI ZANDERS, SARAH ELIZABETH · 2016 to 2018
$747k
NIGMS NIH HHS DP2 GM132936NIGMS NIH HHS R00 GM114436NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM074108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural selection works best when the two alleles in a diploid organism are transmitted to offspring at equal frequencies. Despite this, selfish loci known as meiotic drivers that bias their own transmission into gametes are found throughout eukaryotes. Drive is thought to be a powerful evolutionary force, but empirical evolutionary analyses of drive systems are limited by low numbers of identified meiotic drive genes. Here, we analyze the evolution of the wtf gene family of Schizosaccharomyces pombe that contains both killer meiotic drive genes and suppressors of drive. We completed assemblies of all wtf genes for two S. pombe isolates, as well as a subset of wtf genes from over 50 isolates. We find that wtf copy number can vary greatly between isolates and that amino acid substitutions, expansions and contractions of DNA sequence repeats, and nonallelic gene conversion between family members all contribute to dynamic wtf gene evolution. This work demonstrates the power of meiotic drive to foster rapid evolution and identifies a recombination mechanism through which transposons can indirectly mobilize meiotic drivers.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene ConversionGenes, FungalInheritance PatternsMeiosisMolecular Sequence AnnotationMultigene FamilyRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidSchizosaccharomycesgene conversiongenetic conflictmeiosismeiotic driverapid evolutionrecombination

Identifiers

PMID30991417
PMCPMC6526906
OpenAlexW2949662056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.