Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30991244›Full record

SynthesisClinical psychology review2019

Measurement of substance-free reinforcement in addiction: A systematic review.

Samuel F Acuff, Ashley A Dennhardt, Christopher J Correia, James G Murphy

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical psychology review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Changes in alcohol use during COVID-19 and associations with contextual and individual difference variables: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Community characteristics and substance-free activity and service access predict membership in alcohol use disorder risk profiles.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2025
    Article
  19. Substance use negatively impacts change in reinforcement during the year following substance use treatment.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samuel F AcuffDepartment of Psychology, University of Memphis, 400 Innovation Dr., Memphis, TN 38152, United States.
Ashley A DennhardtDepartment of Psychology, University of Memphis, 400 Innovation Dr., Memphis, TN 38152, United States.
Christopher J CorreiaDepartment of Psychology, Auburn University, 226 Thach Hall, Auburn, AL 36849, United States.
James G MurphyDepartment of Psychology, University of Memphis, 400 Innovation Dr., Memphis, TN 38152, United States. Electronic address: jgmurphy@memphis.edu.

Funding

The role of religiosity, socioeconomic status and the relationship between behavioral economic variables as mediators of negative alcohol-related consequences in African American emerging adultsR01AA024930 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI MACKILLOP, JAMES, MURPHY, JAMES G. · 2017 to 2021
$1.6M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA024930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A robust body of theoretical and experimental work highlights the influence of alternative, substance-free rewards on decisions to use alcohol and other drugs. However, translational applications have been limited in part by the lack of consensus on how to measure substance-free reinforcement in applied and clinical settings. The current study summarizes extant research utilizing self-report reinforcement or reward methodologies, and critically reviews the psychometric properties of the available measures. These studies (N = 50) fell into three categories: measures of recent substance-related and substance-free activity participation and enjoyment (n = 32), measures of time or monetary resource allocation (n = 15), and rating scale measures of reward availability and experience (n = 8). The available research suggests that, consistent with experimental laboratory research and with behavioral economic predictions, there is an inverse relation between substance-free reinforcement and substance use. These studies also support the clinical utility of these measures in predicting substance use severity and course. Reinforcement measures could be improved by enhancing content validity, multimethod convergent validity, and generalizability.

Indexed as

Economics, BehavioralOutcome Assessment, Health CarePsychometricsReinforcement, PsychologyHumansSubstance-Related DisordersAddictionAlternative reinforcementBehavioral economicsRewardSubstance-free reinforcement

Identifiers

PMID30991244
PMCPMC6536329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.