ArticleHippocampus2019
Regulation of gamma-frequency oscillation by feedforward inhibition: A computational modeling study.
Article in Hippocampus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inhibitory tone in the dentate gyrus dynamically prioritizes memory flexibility or stability by tuning a sensitivity-consistency continuum.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Subfield-specific interneuron circuits govern the hippocampal response to novelty in male mice.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Hippocampal interneuronal dysfunction and hyperexcitability in a porcine model of concussion.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Simulations predict differing phase responses to excitation vs. inhibition in theta-resonant pyramidal neurons.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023Article
- Offline memory replay in recurrent neuronal networks emerges from constraints on online dynamics.The Journal of physiology · 2023Article
- Recurrent Excitatory Feedback From Mossy Cells Enhances Sparsity and Pattern Separation in the Dentate GyrusFrontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022Article
- Regulating synchronous oscillations of cerebellar granule cells by different types of inhibition.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Throughout the brain, reciprocally connected excitatory and inhibitory neurons interact to produce gamma-frequency oscillations. The emergent gamma rhythm synchronizes local neural activity and helps to select which cells should fire in each cycle. We previously found that such excitation-inhibition microcircuits, however, have a potentially significant caveat: the frequency of the gamma oscillation and the level of selection (i.e., the percentage of cells that are allowed to fire) vary with the magnitude of the input signal. In networks with varying levels of brain activity, such a feature may produce undesirable instability on the time and spatial structure of the neural signal with a potential for adversely impacting important neural processing mechanisms. Here we propose that feedforward inhibition solves the latter instability problem of the excitation-inhibition microcircuit. Using computer simulations, we show that the feedforward inhibitory signal reduces the dependence of both the frequency of population oscillation and the level of selection on the magnitude of the input excitation. Such a mechanism can produce stable gamma oscillations with its frequency determined only by the properties of the feedforward network, as observed in the hippocampus. As feedforward and feedback inhibition motifs commonly appear together in the brain, we hypothesize that their interaction underlies a robust implementation of general computational principles of neural processing involved in several cognitive tasks, including the formation of cell assemblies and the routing of information between brain areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.