Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30990945›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiology2019

Effect of long-term organic and mineral fertilization strategies on rhizosphere microbiota assemblage and performance of lettuce.

Soumitra Paul Chowdhury, Doreen Babin, Martin Sandmann, Samuel Jacquiod, Loreen Sommermann, Søren Johannes Sørensen, Andreas Fliessbach, Paul Mäder, Joerg Geistlinger, Kornelia Smalla and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
13.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Effects ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  13. Effects of agrochemicals on the beneficial plant rhizobacteria in agricultural systems.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Soumitra Paul ChowdhuryHelmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Network Biology, Germany.
Doreen BabinFederal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Julius Kühn-Institut, Institute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Braunschweig, Germany.
Martin SandmannPlant-Microbe Systems, Leibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Großbeeren, Germany.
Samuel JacquiodAgroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, INRA, University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, France.
Loreen SommermannInstitute of Bioanalytical Sciences, Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Bernburg, Germany.
Søren Johannes SørensenDepartment of Biology, Section of Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Andreas FliessbachDepartment of Soil Sciences, Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick, Switzerland.
Paul MäderDepartment of Soil Sciences, Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick, Switzerland.
Joerg GeistlingerInstitute of Bioanalytical Sciences, Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Bernburg, Germany.
Kornelia SmallaFederal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Julius Kühn-Institut, Institute for Epidemiology and Pathogen Diagnostics, Braunschweig, Germany.
Michael RothballerHelmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Institute of Network Biology, Germany.
Rita GroschPlant-Microbe Systems, Leibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Großbeeren, Germany.
Anhalt University of Applied Sciences · DEForschungsinstitut für Biologischen Landbau · CHHelmholtz Zentrum München · DEJulius Kühn-Institut · DELeibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops · DEInstitut Agro Dijon · FRIT University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung DiControl (Project numbers: 031A560A-F)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term agricultural fertilization strategies gradually change soil properties including the associated microbial communities. Cultivated crops recruit beneficial microbes from the surrounding soil environment via root exudates. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of long-term fertilization strategies across field sites on the rhizosphere prokaryotic (Bacteria and Archaea) community composition and plant performance. We conducted growth chamber experiments with lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) cultivated in soils from two long-term field experiments, each of which compared organic versus mineral fertilization strategies. 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing revealed the assemblage of a rhizosphere core microbiota shared in all lettuce plants across soils, going beyond differences in community composition depending on field site and fertilization strategies. The enhanced expression of several plant genes with roles in oxidative and biotic stress signalling pathways in lettuce grown in soils with organic indicates an induced physiological status in plants. Lettuce plants grown in soils with different fertilization histories were visibly free of stress symptoms and achieved comparable biomass. This suggests a positive aboveground plant response to belowground plant-microbe interactions in the rhizosphere. Besides effects of fertilization strategy and field site, our results demonstrate the crucial role of the plant in driving rhizosphere microbiota assemblage.

Indexed as

Soil MicrobiologyBacteriaBiomassCrops, AgriculturalFertilizersLactucaMicrobiotaMineralsPlant RootsRhizosphereRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilFertilizersMineralsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoil

Identifiers

PMID30990945
PMCPMC6849853
OpenAlexW2939761519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.