Trial reportPloS one2019
Real world usage characteristics of a novel mobile health self-monitoring device: Results from the Scanadu Consumer Health Outcomes (SCOUT) Study.
Trial report in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of the impact of a digital care navigator on increasing patient registration with digital mental health interventions in routine care.Internet interventions · 2024Article
- Individualized Intervention to Support Mental Health Recovery Through Implementation of Digital Tools into Clinical Care: Feasibility Study.Community mental health journal · 2022Article
- Digital navigators to implement smartphone and digital tools in care.Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2020Article
- Indicators of retention in remote digital health studies: a cross-study evaluation of 100,000 participants.NPJ digital medicine · 2020Article
- Changes in Continuous, Long-Term Heart Rate Variability and Individualized Physiological Responses to Wellness and Vacation Interventions Using a Wearable Sensor.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2020Article
- Interindividual Variability in Self-Monitoring of Blood Pressure Using Consumer-Purchased Wireless Devices.Nursing researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A wide range of personal wireless health-related sensor devices are being developed with hope of improving health management. Factors related to effective user engagement, however, are not well-known. We sought to identify factors associated with consistent long-term use of the Scanadu Scout multi-parameter vital sign monitor among individuals who invested in the device through a crowd-funding campaign. Email invitations to join the study were sent to 4525 crowd-funding participants from the US. Those completing a baseline survey were sent a device with follow-up surveys at 3, 12, and 18 months. Of 3872 participants receiving a device, 3473 used it during Week 1, decreasing to 1633 (47 percent) in Week 2. Median time from first use of the device to last use was 17 weeks (IQR: 5-51 weeks) and median uses per week was 1.0 (IQR: 0.6-2.0). Consistent long-term use (defined as remaining in the study at least 26 weeks with at least 3 recordings per week during at least 80% of weeks) was associated with older age, not having children in the household, and frequent use of other medical devices. In the subset of participants answering the 12-month survey (n = 1222), consistent long-term users were more likely to consider the device easy to use and to share results with a healthcare provider. Thirty percent of this subset overall reported improved diet or exercise habits and 25 percent considered medication changes in response to device results. The study shows that even among investors in a device, frequency of device usage fell off rapidly. Understanding how to improve the value of information from personal health-related sensors will be critical to their successful implementation in care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.