ReviewLa Medicina del lavoro2019
Work hazards and workers' mental health: an investigation based on the fifth European Working Conditions Survey.
Review in La Medicina del lavoro, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Influencing Sonographer Grasp and Pincher Strength Before and After Fetal Echocardiograms.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Latent class patterns of work-life balance changes among Korean SME workers during COVID-19 based on organizational support and psychosocial health.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Health of Hispanic/Latino Workers in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL) Sociocultural Ancillary Study: Privileges and Disadvantages of Occupational Status and Exposure to Hazards.Occupational health science · 2025Article
- US Workers' Self-Reported Mental Health Outcomes by Industry and Occupation.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Associations of depressive symptoms and psychosocial working conditions with sickness absences in a Finnish cohort of 11,495 employees.Preventive medicine reports · 2024Article
- Effort-reward imbalance and sleep quality in railway locomotive stewards: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Nicotine suppresses crystalline silica-induced astrocyte activation and neuronal death by inhibiting NF-κB in the mouse hippocampus.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Article
- Health Status, Type of Contract and Labour Force Participation.Journal of prevention (2022) · 2024Article
- A mentally healthy framework to guide employers and policy makers.Frontiers in public health · 2024Review
- Associations of Workplace Violence With Cardiovascular Disease Among United States Workers: Findings From a National Survey.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2023Article
- Savings, home ownership, and depression in low-income US adults.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2021Observational
- Resilience as a Protective Factor in Basic Military Training, a Longitudinal Study of the Swiss Armed Forces.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Association between physical hazardous agent exposure and mental health in the Korean working population: the 5th Korean Working Conditions Survey.Annals of occupational and environmental medicine · 2021Article
- Psychosocial and Ergonomic Conditions at Work: Influence on the Probability of a Workplace Accident.BioMed research international · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWorkplace hazards are a significant source of health impairment for workers and of financial losses for firms. EU directives on workers' health and safety standards significantly contributed to reduce reported occupational injuries, yet the incidence and prevalence of work-related mental illness is still very high.
objectivesWe investigated the association between work-related hazards and individuals' perceived mental health. We reviewed the existing evidence on the channels through which task-related factors, adverse agents and psychosocial factors are expected to affect workers' health, with specific regard to mental health.
methodsWe used data from the fifth wave of the European Working Conditions Survey, covering over 40,000 face-to-face interviews with workers in 34 countries, which includes information on socio-demographic characteristics, firms and jobs attributes, employment status, as well as working conditions and health status. We carried out an empirical analysis with multivariate regression models in order to estimate the relationship between workers' mental health problems and workplace risk factors.
results21,020 interviews were used in the multivariate analysis. We found strong correlations between hazards and various indicators of mental health. Among hazardous agents, low temperatures (β=0.0287) and contact with infectious materials (β=0.0394) were positively associated with mental health outcomes. Among task/sequence-related factors, tiring or painful positions (β=0.0713), repetitive hand/arm movements (β=0.0255), working with VDUs (β=0.0301), repetitive tasks <10 min (β=0.0859) and working in evenings (β=0.00754) were positively associated with mental health. Various psychosocial risk factors related to both the content of the job (for example, frequent disruptive interruptions: β=0.219, working in free time: β=0.0759, poor work-life balance: β=0.228) as well as the job context (for example, bad employment prospects: β=0.177, low decisional autonomy: β=0.245, bad social relations: β=0.186, workplace violence: β=0.411) were positively associated with mental health. The main results of the decomposition show that an important contribution to workers' overall mental distress at work is associated with psychosocial risk factors (up to 60% for depression/anxiety symptoms and sleep disorders), while the contribution of somatic factors is on average lower (up to 20% for overall fatigue).
conclusionsWe argue that action is needed to improve workers' mental well-being, and reduce the economic costs for both the national health system and employers. Regulations and traditional economic measures are unlikely to prove successful in providing adequate standards of primary and secondary preventive measures in the work place without an appropriate and reliable Risk Assessment Procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.