Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30990221›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2019

TP53 Status as a Determinant of Pro- vs Anti-Tumorigenic Effects of Estrogen Receptor-Beta in Breast Cancer.

Utpal K Mukhopadhyay, Chetan C Oturkar, Christina Adams, Nadi Wickramasekera, Sanjay Bansal, Rajesh Medisetty, Austin Miller, Wendy M Swetzig, Laxmi Silwal-Pandit, Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale and 9 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Significance of dysregulated M2 macrophage andTranslational cancer research · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Utpal K Mukhopadhyay
Chetan C Oturkar
Christina Adams
Nadi Wickramasekera
Sanjay Bansal
Rajesh Medisetty
Austin Miller
Wendy M Swetzig
Laxmi Silwal-Pandit
Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
Chad J Creighton
Jun Hyoung Park
Santhi D Konduri
Alka Mukhopadhyay
Alexander Caradori
Angela Omilian
Wiam Bshara
Benny Abraham Kaipparettu
Gokul M Das

Funding

Two-Spirit Films in Indigenous Cancer HealthP30CA016056 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI Dean G. Tang · 1985 to 2026
$116.6M
RPCI-UPCI Ovarian Cancer SPOREP50CA159981 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI MOYSICH, KIRSTEN B., ODUNSI, KUNLE · 2013 to 2025
$19.6M
Summer Research Experiences in Quantitative Cancer Sciences and Emerging TechnologiesR25CA181003 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI PAMELA A HERSHBERGER, Mukund Seshadri · 2014 to 2026
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016056NCI NIH HHS P50 CA159981NCI NIH HHS R25 CA181003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnti-tumorigenic vs pro-tumorigenic roles of estrogen receptor-beta (ESR2) in breast cancer remain unsettled. We investigated the potential of TP53 status to be a determinant of the bi-faceted role of ESR2 and associated therapeutic implications for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).

methodsESR2-TP53 interaction was analyzed with multiple assays including the in situ proximity ligation assay. Transcriptional effects on TP53-target genes and cell proliferation in response to knocking down or overexpressing ESR2 were determined. Patient survival according to ESR2 expression levels and TP53 mutation status was analyzed in the basal-like TNBC subgroup in the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (n = 308) and Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (n = 46) patient cohorts by univariate Cox regression and log-rank test. All statistical tests are two-sided.

resultsESR2 interaction with wild-type and mutant TP53 caused pro-proliferative and anti-proliferative effects, respectively. Depleting ESR2 in cells expressing wild-type TP53 resulted in increased expression of TP53-target genes CDKN1A (control group mean [SD] = 1 [0.13] vs ESR2 depletion group mean [SD] = 2.08 [0.24], P = .003) and BBC3 (control group mean [SD] = 1 [0.06] vs ESR2 depleted group mean [SD] = 1.92 [0.25], P = .003); however, expression of CDKN1A (control group mean [SD] = 1 [0.21] vs ESR2 depleted group mean [SD] = 0.56 [0.12], P = .02) and BBC3 (control group mean [SD] = 1 [0.03] vs ESR2 depleted group mean [SD] = 0.55 [0.09], P = .008) was decreased in cells expressing mutant TP53. Overexpressing ESR2 had opposite effects. Tamoxifen increased ESR2-mutant TP53 interaction, leading to reactivation of TP73 and apoptosis. High levels of ESR2 expression in mutant TP53-expressing basal-like tumors is associated with better prognosis (Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium cohort: log-rank P = .001; hazard ratio = 0.26, 95% confidence interval = 0.08 to 0.84, univariate Cox P = .02).

conclusionsTP53 status is a determinant of the functional duality of ESR2. Our study suggests that ESR2-mutant TP53 combination prognosticates survival in TNBC revealing a novel strategy to stratify TNBC for therapeutic intervention potentially by repurposing tamoxifen.

Indexed as

MutationBiomarkers, TumorCarcinogenesisCell ProliferationCohort StudiesEstrogen Receptor betaFemaleHumansMutant ProteinsPrognosisSurvival RateTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsTumor Cells, CulturedTumor Suppressor Protein p53Biomarkers, TumorESR2 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor betaMutant ProteinsTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID30990221
PMCPMC6855950
OpenAlexW2938285217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.