Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30989567›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2019

The Impact of Staple Line Reinforcement Utilization on Bleeding and Leak Rates Following Sleeve Gastrectomy for Severe Obesity: a Propensity and Case-Control Matched Analysis.

Matthew Cunningham-Hill, Michael Mazzei, Huaqing Zhao, Xiaoning Lu, Michael A Edwards

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Use of Lower Staple Heights in Robotic Sleeve Gastrectomy: National Trends and Impact on Outcomes.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2025
    Article
  5. Key techniques of laparoscopic RouxZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. THE ROUTINE USE OF THE METHYLENE BLUE TEST IN SLEEVE GASTRECTOMY: WHY NOT?Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Practices concerning sleeve gastrectomy in Turkey: A survey of surgeons.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matthew Cunningham-HillDepartment of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Parkinson Pavilion Suite 410, 3401, North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA.
Michael MazzeiDepartment of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Parkinson Pavilion Suite 410, 3401, North Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19140, USA.
Huaqing ZhaoDivision of Biostatistics, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Xiaoning LuDivision of Biostatistics, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Michael A EdwardsDepartment of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL, 3224, USA. edwards.michael@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4811-0789

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionStaple line reinforcement (SLR) is a commonly used technique during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) for severe obesity. There remains controversy over the potential benefit or risk associated with SLR. There are currently no consensus recommendations about SLR use. Its use is surgeon-dependent and remains controversial. STUDY

aimTo determine the impact of staple line reinforcement on staple line leak and bleeding rates after sleeve gastrectomy.

methodsUsing the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Quality Improvement Program Participant User File (MBSQIP-PUF) database, we identified patients who had a SG in 2015 and 2016. SLR utilization status was used to create two cohorts. An unmatched cohort analysis was performed, and the outcomes were compared. A propensity score and case-control matched cohort analysis were then performed, and the outcomes were compared. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS and SAS.

resultsOf the 189,173 SG cases identified, SLR utilization was noted in 127,521 (67.4%). In the unmatched analysis, bleeding and reoperation were significantly higher in the cohort without SLR utilization. In both propensity score and case-control matched analysis, bleeding and reoperation remained significantly higher in the cohort without SLR utilization. There was no difference in mortality and staple line leak rates between the cohorts.

conclusionsSLR significantly reduces bleeding and reoperation rates following SG and has no deleterious impact on staple line leak rate. While further prospective studies factoring in the SLR method and staple characteristics are needed, this large database analysis supports the use of routine SLR during SG to reduce the risk of perioperative bleeding and reoperation.

Indexed as

AdultAnastomotic LeakBariatric SurgeryCase-Control StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleGastrectomyHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidPostoperative HemorrhagePropensity ScoreProspective StudiesReoperationBleeding rateLeak rateSleeve gastrectomyStaple line reinforcement

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.