ArticleNeurochemical research2019
In Vivo Phenotyping of Familial Parkinson's Disease with Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells: A Proof-of-Concept Study.
Article in Neurochemical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Cell therapy for neurological disorders.Nature medicine · 2024Review
- Recent Advances in High-Content Imaging and Analysis in iPSC-Based Modelling of Neurodegenerative Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Challenges involved in cell therapy for Parkinson's disease using human pluripotent stem cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Review
- High content screening and proteomic analysis identify a kinase inhibitor that rescues pathological phenotypes in a patient-derived model of Parkinson's disease.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2022Article
- α-synuclein pathogenesis in hiPSC models of Parkinson's disease.Neuronal signaling · 2021Review
- Phospholipase iPLANature chemical biology · 2021Article
- Modelling Parkinson's Disease: iPSCs towards Better Understanding of Human Pathology.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- Electrophysiological Phenotype Characterization of Human iPSC-Derived Neuronal Cell Lines by Means of High-Density Microelectrode Arrays.Advanced biology · 2021Article
- Patient-Derived Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Based Models in Parkinson's Disease for Drug Identification.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- A compendious summary of Parkinson's disease patient-derived iPSCs in the first decade.Annals of translational medicine · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder. We have previously developed a disease-in-a-dish model for familial PD using induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from two patients carrying the p.A53T α-synuclein (αSyn) mutation. By directed differentiation, we generated a model that displays disease-relevant phenotypes, including protein aggregation, compromised neurite outgrowth, axonal neuropathology and synaptic defects. Here we investigated the in vivo phenotypes of iPSCs, derived from one patient, after transplantation in a lesion mouse model established by unilateral intrastriatal 6-hydroxydopamine injection in the immunosuppressed NOD/SCID strain. Immunohistochemistry revealed that despite the disease-related characteristics that mutant cells displayed when maintained up to 70 days in vitro, they could survive and differentiate in vivo over a 12-week period. However, some differences were noted between patient-derived and control grafts, including a significant rise in αSyn immunoreactivity that might signal a first step towards pathology. Moreover, control-derived grafts appeared to integrate better than PD grafts within the host tissue extending projections that formed more contacts with host striatal neurons. Our data suggest that the distinct disease-related characteristics which p.A53T cells develop in vitro, may be attenuated or take longer to emerge in vivo after transplantation within the mouse brain. Further analysis of the phenotypes that patient cells acquire over longer periods of time as well as the use of multiple iPSC clones from different patients should extend our current proof-of-concept study and provide additional evidence for in vivo disease modeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.