Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30989471›Full record

ArticleJournal of youth and adolescence2019

Social Ties Cut Both Ways: Self-Harm and Adolescent Peer Networks.

Molly Copeland, Sonja E Siennick, Mark E Feinberg, James Moody, Daniel T Ragan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of youth and adolescence, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Our Friends Keep Us Together: The Stability of Adolescents' Cross-Race Friendships.Social forces; a scientific medium of social study and interpretation · 2023
    Article
  9. Embedded Distress: Social Integration, Gender, and Adolescent Depression.Social forces; a scientific medium of social study and interpretation · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Molly CopelandDepartment of Sociology, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA. mc418@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4311-2673
Sonja E SiennickCollege of Criminology and Criminal Justice, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, 32306, USA.
Mark E FeinbergEdna Bennett Pierce Prevention Research Center, Pennsylvania State University, 310 BioBehavioral Health, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
James MoodyDepartment of Sociology, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA.
Daniel T RaganDepartment of Sociology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA.
Duke University · USFlorida State University · USPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

Partnership Model for Diffusion of Proven PreventionR01DA013709 · NIDA · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SPOTH, RICHARD · 2002 to 2017
$35.0M
Science CoreP2CHD065563 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Giovanna M Merli · 2015 to 2026
$5.7M
Friendship Networks and Emergence of Substance UseR01DA018225 · NIDA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI FEINBERG, MARK ETHAN · 2007 to 2017
$2.9M
Models and Tools for Dynamic Health-Relevant Diffusion over Complex NetworksR01HD075712 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOODY, JAMES, MUCHA, PETER JOHN · 2013 to 2018
$1.8M
Focused Training in Social Networks and HealthR25HD079352 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MOODY, JAMES · 2015 to 2024
$1.6M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD065563NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD075712NICHD NIH HHS R25 HD079352NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA013709NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA018225W.T. Grant Foundation 8316
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peers play an important role in adolescence, a time when self-harm arises as a major health risk, but little is known about the social networks of adolescents who cut. Peer network positions can affect mental distress related to cutting or provide direct social motivations for self-harm. This study uses PROSPER survey data from U.S. high school students (n = 11,160, 48% male, grades 11 and 12), finding that social networks predict self-cutting net of demographics and depressive symptoms. In final models, bridging peers predicts higher self-cutting, while claiming more friends predicts lower cutting for boys. The findings suggest that researchers and practitioners should consider peer networks both a beneficial resource and source of risk associated with cutting for teens and recognize the sociostructural contexts of self-harm for adolescents more broadly.

Indexed as

Self-Injurious BehaviorSocial SupportAdolescentDepressionFemaleFriendsHumansMaleMental DisordersMotivationPeer GroupStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescencePeer networksSelf-harmSocial networks

Identifiers

PMID30989471
PMCPMC6640100
OpenAlexW2937731994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.