Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30989465›Full record

ReviewDigestive diseases and sciences2019

Recent Advances in Prevention and Therapies for Clinical or Experimental Necrotizing Enterocolitis.

Kewei Wang, Guozhong Tao, Karl G Sylvester

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Preterm neonatal immunology at the intestinal interface.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kewei WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110001, Liaoning Province, China. kwwang@cmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-3816-1024
Guozhong TaoDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
Karl G SylvesterDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is one of the most severe diseases of preterm neonates and has a high mortality rate. With the development of inspection techniques and new biomarkers, the diagnostic accuracy of NEC is constantly improving. The most recognized potential risk factors include prematurity, formula-feeding, infection, and microbial dysbiosis. With further understanding of the pathogenesis, more effective prevention and therapies will be applied to clinical or experimental NEC. At present, such new potential prevention and therapies for NEC are mainly focused on the Toll-like receptor 4 inflammatory signaling pathway, the repair of intestinal barrier function, probiotics, antioxidative stress, breast-feeding, and immunomodulatory agents. Many new studies have changed our understanding of the pathogenesis of NEC and improve our approaches for preventing and treating of NEC each year. This review provides an overview of the recent researches focused on clinical or experimental NEC and highlights the advances made within the past 5 years toward the development of new potential preventive approaches and therapies for this disease.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingInfant, Low Birth WeightAnimalsEnterocolitis, NecrotizingHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Premature, DiseasesProbioticsToll-Like Receptor 4TLR4 protein, humanToll-Like Receptor 4NECNecrotizing enterocolitisPreterm neonatePreventionToll-like receptorTreatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.