Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30989255›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2019

Development of the Australian neighborhood social fragmentation index and its association with spatial variation in depression across communities.

Nasser Bagheri, Philip J Batterham, Luis Salvador-Carulla, Yingxi Chen, Andrew Page, Alison L Calear, Peter Congdon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The spatial analysis of multimorbidity in Thai Cohort Study.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. What Is Rural Adversity, How Does It Affect Wellbeing and What Are the Implications for Action?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nasser BagheriCentre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. Nasser.bagheri@anu.edu.au.
Philip J BatterhamCentre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Luis Salvador-CarullaCentre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Yingxi ChenResearch School of Population Health, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Andrew PageTranslational Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Alison L CalearCentre for Mental Health Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
Peter CongdonSchool of Geography, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Australian National University · AUQueen Mary University of London · GBWestern Sydney University · AU

Funding

Australian Research Council DE140101570
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe know little about how community structures influence the risk of common mental illnesses. This study presents a new way to establish links between depression and social fragmentation, thereby identifying pathways to better target mental health services and prevention programs to the right people in the right place.

methodA principal components analysis (PCA) was conducted to develop the proposed Australian neighborhood social fragmentation index (ANSFI). General practice clinical data were used to identify cases of diagnosed depression. The association between ANSFI and depression was explored using multilevel logistic regression. Spatial hot spots (clusters) of depression prevalence and social fragmentation at the statistical area level 1 (SA1) were examined.

resultsTwo components of social fragmentation emerged, reflecting fragmentation related to family structure and mobility. Individuals treated for depression in primary care were more likely to live in neighborhoods with lower socioeconomic status and with higher social fragmentation related to family structure. A 1-SD increase in social fragmentation was associated with a 16% higher depression prevalence (95% CI 11%, 20%). However, the association attenuated with adjustment for neighborhood socio-economic status. Considerable spatial variation in social fragmentation and depression patterns across communities was observed.

conclusionsDeveloping a social fragmentation index for the first time in Australia at a small area level generates a new line of knowledge on the impact of community structures on health risks. Findings may extend our understanding of the mechanisms that drive geographical variation in the incidence of common mental disorders and mental health care.

Indexed as

Social ClassSpatial AnalysisAdultAustraliaDepressionFemaleHumansIncidenceLogistic ModelsMaleMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedPrevalenceResidence CharacteristicsYoung AdultDepressionGeographic information systems (GIS)Mental disordersPrimary careSocial fragmentation index

Identifiers

PMID30989255
OpenAlexW2937862633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.