Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30988997›Full record

ReviewJournal of pharmacopuncture2019

Reza Shirazinia, Vafa Baradaran Rahimi, Ashrafali Rezaie Kehkhaie, Amirhossein Sahebkar, Hassan Rakhshandeh, Vahid Reza Askari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pharmacopuncture, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Preventive Effects of anNutrients · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Phytochemical, biological, and nutritional properties of the prickly pear,Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Review
  9. Semisynthesis of Betaxanthins from Purified Betacyanin ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Beneficial Effects ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  15. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Protective Effect ofTheScientificWorldJournal · 2021
    Article
  19. Protective Effect ofEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Reza ShiraziniaDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Vafa Baradaran RahimiStudent Research Committee, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Ashrafali Rezaie KehkhaieDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Amirhossein SahebkarNeurogenic Inflammation Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Hassan RakhshandehStudent Research Committee, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Vahid Reza AskariStudent Research Committee, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generative and vegetative parts of the cactuses have had a long-lasting position in folk medicine and their effects could partly be confirmed in scientific experiments. Nowadays, the cactus, fruits, and cladodes are the focus of many studies because of their desirable properties. Therefore, the summarized reports of valuable properties of medicinal plants may be a good way to familiarize researches with a new source of drugs with lower side effects and higher efficacy.

Indexed as

anti-oxidantanti-tumorimmuno-modulationneuro-protectionOpuntia dilleniipharmacological activity

Identifiers

PMID30988997
PMCPMC6461298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.