ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2019
The association between CD69 and EGR1 levels, and CHD patients without reflow after PCI.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Isoflurane Preconditioning Alleviates Hypoxia/Reoxygenation-Induced Cardiomyocyte Injury by Inhibiting miR-195-3p Expression.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2024Article
- Anti-inflammatory effect of up-regulated microRNA-221-3p on coronary heart disease via suppressing NLRP3/ASC/pro-caspase-1 inflammasome pathway activation.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Association between CD69 and EGR1 levels and coronary heart disease (CHD) patients without reflow after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was investigated. Data of 156 patients undergoing PCI from September 2014 to December 2016 in People's Hospital of Hunan Province were analyzed, and they were divided into 72 cases in reflow group (group A) and 84 cases in no-reflow group (group B) according to the patient's postoperative blood flow. Another 70 volunteers undergoing normal physical examination in the same period were selected as control group (group C). The venous blood was extracted from patients before operation, at 5 min, 2 h and 6 months after operation, the serum CD69 and EGR1 levels were detected with flow cytometry and RT-qPCR methods, and association between CD69 and EGR1 levels and postoperative blood flow recovery was analyzed. CD69 expression before and 2 h after operation in group A was significant (P<0.05), and a difference in patients at 6 months after operation between group A, B and group C (P<0.05). The CD69 expression in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (P<0.05), but in group B was significantly higher than that in group C (P<0.05). The EGR1 expression in group A was significantly higher than that in group B (P<0.05), but in group B was significantly lower than that in group C (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that CD69 (OR=6.424, P=0.025) and EGR1 (OR=3.684, P=0.013) were independent risk factors for patients without reflow after undergoing PCI. After undergoing PCI in CHD patients, if there was an increase in CD69 level and a significant decrease in EGR1 level in the early postoperative period, the patient may be suspected of having no-reflow and checked in time to improve the patient's therapeutic effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.