Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30988693›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2019

Alternative methods of estimating the water potential at turgor loss point in

Jonathan M Banks, Andrew D Hirons

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. A combination of morphological, biochemical and structural responses is required for desiccation tolerance inPhysiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Aerosol Impacts on Water Relations of Camphor (Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan M Banks1School of Agriculture Policy and Development, The University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire RG6 6AR UK.
Andrew D HironsUniversity Centre Myerscough, Bilsborrow, Preston, Lancashire PR3 0RY UK.
Myerscough College · GBUniversity of Reading · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelecting for drought tolerance in urban tree species can have a significant influence on survival rates, aftercare requirements and performance. The water potential at turgor loss point (π

resultsThe sensitivity of three methods used to determine this valuable selection parameter were evaluated. A classical pressure chamber, pressure-volume (P-V) curve method was compared with vapour-pressure osmometer (Vapro

conclusionBoth the osmometer and hygrometer methods ranked genotypes with a very high similarity (R

Indexed as

Drought toleranceHygrometerOsmometerPressure-bombPressure–volume curveTurgor loss point

Identifiers

PMID30988693
PMCPMC6448274
OpenAlexW2944436381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.