ArticleCancer management and research2019
Article in Cancer management and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification and Validation of Tumorigenesis Related Hub Genes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma via Integrated Bioinformatics Analysis.Iranian journal of biotechnology · 2025Article
- Single-Cell and Spatial Transcriptomics Explore Purine Metabolism-Related Prognostic Risk Model and Tumor Immune Microenvironment Modulation in Ovarian Cancer.Human mutation · 2025Article
- m6A RNA methylation regulators were associated with the malignancy and prognosis of ovarian cancer.Bioengineered · 2021Article
- Identification of the potential novel biomarkers as susceptibility gene for Wilms tumor.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Identification and Validation of Hub Genes Associated With Hepatocellular CarcinomaFrontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Establishment of an Immune-Related Gene Signature for Risk Stratification for Patients with Glioma.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021Article
- Identification of Hub Genes Associated with Hypertension and Their Interaction with miRNA Based on Weighted Gene Coexpression Network Analysis (WGCNA) Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020Article
- Identification of Hub Genes in High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer Using Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEpithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a female malignant tumor. Bioinformatics has been widely utilized to analyze genes related to cancer progression. Targeted therapy for specific biological factors has become more valuable. MATERIALS AND
methodsGene expression profiles of GSE18520 and GSE27651 were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus. We used the "limma" package to screen differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between EOC and normal ovarian tissue samples and then used Clusterprofiler to do functional and pathway enrichment analyses. We utilized Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes Database to assess protein-protein interaction (PPI) information and the plug-in Molecular Complex Detection to screen hub modules of PPI network in Cytoscape, and then performed functional analysis on the genes in the hub module. Next, we utilized the Weighted Gene Expression Network Analysis package to establish a co-expression network. Validation of the key genes in databases and Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) were completed. Finally, we used quantitative real-time PCR to validate hub gene expression in clinical tissue samples.
resultsWe analyzed the DEGs (96 samples of EOC tissue and 16 samples of normal ovarian tissue) for functional analysis, which showed that upregulated DEGs were strikingly enriched in phosphate ion binding and the downregulated DEGs were significantly enriched in glycosaminoglycan binding. In the PPI network, CDK1 was screened as the most relevant protein. In the co-expression network, one EOC-related module was identified. For survival analysis, database and clinical sample validation of genes in the turquoise module, we found that
conclusionIn this study, we exhibited the key genes and pathways involved in EOC and speculated that
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.