SynthesisDrug design, development and therapy2019
Effectiveness and safety of intravenous application of dexmedetomidine for cesarean section under general anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Synthesis in Drug design, development and therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Effect of Local Infiltration of Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant on Breakthrough Pain During Epidural Labor Analgesia: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Trial
- Effect of intraoperative injection of esketamine on postoperative analgesia and postoperative rehabilitation after cesarean section.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Trial
- Esketamine Combined with Dexmedetomidine to reduce Visceral Pain During elective Cesarean Section Under Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia: A double-Blind Randomized Controlled Study.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024Trial
- The Effect of Opioid-Free Anesthesia with Transversus Abdominis Plane Block on Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Randomized Controlled Study.Journal of pain research · 2024Trial
- Impact of Intraoperative Infusion and Postoperative PCIA of Dexmedetomidine on Early Breastfeeding After Elective Cesarean Section: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2020Trial
- Opioid-free anesthesia with a mixture of dexmedetomidine, ketamine, and lidocaine in one syringe for surgery in obese patients.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Article
- The Advantage of Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Acute Pain Management During Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe meta-analysis was conducted to assess the effectiveness and safety of intravenous administration of dexmedetomidine for cesarean section under general anesthesia, as well as neonatal outcomes. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure database for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the application of intravenous dexmedetomidine under general anesthesia for cesarean section. RevMan 5.3 was used to conduct the meta-analysis of the outcomes of interest.
resultsEight RCTs involved 376 participants were included in this study. The meta-analysis showed that the mean blood pressure at the time of intubation (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -15.67, 95% CI: -21.21, -10.13, P<0.00001), skin incision (WMD: -12.83, 95% CI -20.53, -5.14, P=0.001), and delivery (WMD: -11.65, 95% CI -17.18, -6.13, P<0.0001) in dexmedetomidine group were significantly lower than that in the control group. The heart rate (HR) at the time of intubation (WMD: -31.41, 95% CI -35.01, -27.81, P<0.00001), skin incision (WMD: -22.32, 95% CI -34.55, -10.10, P=0.0003), and delivery (WMD: -19.07, 95% CI -22.09, -16.04, P<0.00001) were also lower than that in control group. For neonatal parameters, no differences existed in umbilical blood gases at delivery, and Apgar scores at 1 minute (WMD: -0.12, 95% CI -0.37, 0.12, P=0.33) and 5 minutes (WMD: -0.17, 95% CI -0.13, 0.46, P=0.27) among two groups.
conclusionIntravenous administration of dexmedetomidine could efficiently attenuate the maternal cardiovascular response during cesarean section, without affecting Apgar score of the neonate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.