Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30988535›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2019

A comparative evaluation of pre-emptive versus post-surgery intraperitoneal local anaesthetic instillation for postoperative pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective, randomised, double blind and placebo controlled study.

Prabhu Gnapika Putta, Hemalatha Pasupuleti, Aloka Samantaray, Hemanth Natham, Mangu Hanumantha Rao

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06632184 (Pilot Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Multimodal Management With Peritoneal Lavage Using Saline Solution Versus Saline Solution With Ondansetron in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06632184 phase4active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Comparative Study on the Efficacy of Multimodal Management With Peritoneal Lavage Using Saline Solution Versus Saline Solution With Ondansetron in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto Mexicano del Seguro SocialRan2025 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsPostoperative Pain Management, Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Ondansetron, Postoperative Nausea and VomitingArmsOndansetron Intraperitoneal Lavage, Saline Intraperitoneal Lavage
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Prabhu Gnapika PuttaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Sri Venkateswara Institute and Medical Sciences, SVIMS University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Hemalatha PasupuletiDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Sri Venkateswara Institute and Medical Sciences, SVIMS University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Aloka SamantarayDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Sri Venkateswara Institute and Medical Sciences, SVIMS University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Hemanth NathamDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Sri Venkateswara Institute and Medical Sciences, SVIMS University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Mangu Hanumantha RaoDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, Sri Venkateswara Institute and Medical Sciences, SVIMS University, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsIntraperitoneal local anaesthetic instillation (IPLAI) reduces postoperative pain and analgesic consumption effectively but the timing of instillation remains debatable. This study aims at comparing pre-emptive versus post-surgery IPLA in controlling postoperative pain after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

methodsNinety patients belonging to American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II were randomly assigned to receive IPLAI of either 30 ml of normal saline (C) or 30 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine at the beginning (PE) or at the end of the surgery (PS) using a double-dummy technique. The primary outcome was the intensity of postoperative pain by visual analogue scale score (VAS) at 30 minute, 1, 2, 4, 6, 24 hours after surgery and time to the first request for analgesia. The secondary outcomes were analgesic request rate in 24 hours; duration of hospital stay and time to return to normal activity. Data were compared using analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis or Chi-square test.

resultsFor all predefined time points, VAS in group PE was significantly lower than that in groups C (

conclusionPre-emptive intraperitoneal local anaesthetic instillation resulted in better postoperative pain control along with reduced incidence of shoulder pain and early resumption of normal activity in comparison to post surgery IPLAI and control.

Indexed as

Analgesiabupivacainecholecystectomyintraperitoneallaparoscopy

Identifiers

PMID30988535
PMCPMC6423947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.