ArticleScientific reports2019
Dysbiosis patterns during re-induction/salvage versus induction chemotherapy for acute leukemia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lasting shift in the gut microbiota in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.Blood advances · 2022Trial
- Fecal Microbiota Transplantation and Microbiota-Based Therapeutics in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Review
- Immune interplay between sepsis and haematological malignancies.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2026Review
- Short-chain fatty acid-producing microbes differentiate non-infectious and infectious neutropenic fever in leukemia.mSystems · 2026Article
- Beyond antibiotics: collateral damage to the gut microbiome during cancer therapy.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Microbiome-Informed Dosing: Exploring Gut Microbial Communities Impact on Mycophenolate Enterohepatic Circulation and Therapeutic Target Achievement.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Article
- Unraveling the Intestinal Microbiota Conundrum in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Fingerprints, Clinical Implications and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Gut microbiota restoration with oral pooled fecal microbiotherapy after intensive chemotherapy: the phase 1b CIMON trial.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Microbial Crosstalk with Therapy: Pharmacomicrobiomics in AML-One Step Closer to Personalized Medicine.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Understanding gut Microbiome changes in Korean children, adolescents, and young adults with hematologic malignancies.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
- A Literature Review on the Impact of the Gut Microbiome on Cancer Treatment Efficacy, Disease Evolution and Toxicity: The Implications for Hematological Malignancies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Gut Microbiome as a Potential Marker of Hematologic Recovery Following Induction Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Causal Relationship Between Gut Microbiota and Leukemia: Future Perspectives.Oncology and therapy · 2024Review
- Article
- Interaction of the Gut Microbiome With Cancer Treatment.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2024Review
- Gut diversity and the resistome as biomarkers of febrile neutropenia outcome in paediatric oncology patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Intestinal Microbes and Hematological Malignancies.Cancers · 2023Review
- Klebsiella quasipneumoniae in intestine damages bile acid metabolism in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation patients with bloodstream infection.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Alleviated Paclitaxel-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy by Interfering with Astrocytes and TLR4/p38MAPK Pathway in Rats.Journal of pain research · 2023Article
- Compilation of longitudinal gut microbiome, serum metabolome, and clinical data in acute myeloid leukemia.Scientific data · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute leukemia (AL) patients undergoing intensive induction chemotherapy develop severe gut dysbiosis, placing them at heightened risk for infectious complications. Some AL patients will undergo "repeat therapy" (re-induction or salvage) due to persistent or relapsed disease. We hypothesized that prior injury to the microbiome during induction may influence dysbiosis patterns during repeat therapy. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed the bacterial microbiome profiles of thrice-weekly stool samples from 20 intensively treated AL patients (first induction: 13, repeat therapy: 7) by 16S rRNA sequencing. In mixed-effects modeling, repeat therapy was a significant predictor of Enterococcus expansion (P = 0.006), independently of antibiotic exposure, disease type, feeding mode, and week of chemotherapy. Bayesian analysis of longitudinal data demonstrated larger departures of microbial communities from the pre-chemotherapy baseline during repeat therapy compared to induction. This increased ecosystem instability during repeat therapy possibly impairs colonization resistance and increases vulnerability to Enterococcus outgrowth. Microbiota restoration therapies at the end of induction or before starting subsequent therapy warrant investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.