ArticleSpinal cord2019
Quality of life and its predictors in people with traumatic spinal cord injury in mainland China.
Article in Spinal cord, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disability trajectories individuals with spinal cord injury in mainland China: do psychosocial resources and diseases factors predict trajectories?Spinal cord · 2025Observational
- Determinants of low satisfaction with life among wheelchair users with spinal cord injury in Egypt: a cross-sectional study.BMC neurology · 2024Article
- Patterns of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction management and associated factors among Chinese community-dwelling individuals with spinal cord injury.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Transcranial magnetic stimulation-based closed-loop modality for activity of daily living gain in spinal cord injury: a retrospective study using propensity score matching analysis.European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2023Observational
- Relationship between neurogenic bowel dysfunction severity and functional status, depression, and quality of life in individuals with spinal cord injury.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2023Article
- Sex, age, role and geographic differences in traumatic spinal fractures caused by motor vehicle collisions: a multicentre retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2023Observational
- Environmental barriers and participation restrictions in community-dwelling individuals with spinal cord injury in Jiangsu and Sichuan Provinces of China: Results from a cross-sectional survey.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2023Article
- Preliminary validation study of the WHO quality of life (WHOQOL) scales for people with spinal cord injury in Mainland China.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2022Article
- Access and engagement with places in the community, and the quality of life among people with spinal cord damage.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Identification and relationship of quality of life and self-care ability among Chinese patients with traumatic spinal cord injuries: a cross-sectional analysis.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2021Article
- Long non-coding RNA Mirt2 relieves lipopolysaccharide-induced injury in PC12 cells by suppressing miR-429.Journal of physiology and biochemistry · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designCross-sectional survey.
objectiveTo assess quality of life (QOL) and the predictors of QOL in people with spinal cord injury (SCI).
settingShanghai Yangzhi Rehabilitation Hospital, Mainland China.
methodsThree hundred adult participants with SCI completed standardized self-report measures. The study assessed QOL, demographic and injury variables, psychological factors and community participation. Psychological factors included resilience, post-traumatic growth, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety and depression. Descriptive analyses were used to calculate the QOL, psychological outcomes, and community participation scores. The relationship between all the factors was examined using Pearson correlation analysis. Regression analyses were performed to determine the independent predictors of QOL.
resultsThe mean range of items for four domains of QOL was from 3.0 to 3.2. Resilience and post-traumatic growth showed significant positive relationships with each domain of QOL (range of r from 0.26 to 0.53, p < 0.01). Post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety, and depression showed negative relationships with each domain of QOL (range of r from -0.67 to -0.27, p < 0.01). Community participation showed weak significant relationships with three domains of QOL. Participants' self-reported perception of environmental barriers and the five psychological outcomes were the most significant predictors of QOL. Community participation did not show any predictive effect.
conclusionsThe QOL of people with SCI in Mainland China needs improvement. Many factors influence QOL, especially psychological outcome variables. Promoting mental health in individuals with SCI is critical to improving overall QOL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30988399What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.