Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30988395›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2019

Reduction of cervical cancer incidence within a primary HPV screening pilot project (WOLPHSCREEN) in Wolfsburg, Germany.

Johannes Horn, Agnieszka Denecke, Alexander Luyten, Beate Rothe, Axel Reinecke-Lüthge, Rafael Mikolajczyk, Karl Ulrich Petry

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Johannes HornInstitute for Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics, and Informatics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Agnieszka DeneckeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Wolfsburg, Wolfsburg, Germany.
Alexander LuytenAbts+partner, Frauenärzte, Prüner Gang, Kiel, Germany.
Beate RotheCentral Laboratory, Klinikum Wolfsburg, Wolfsburg, Germany.
Axel Reinecke-LüthgeInstitute of Pathology, Klinikum Wolfsburg, Wolfsburg, Germany.
Rafael MikolajczykInstitute for Medical Epidemiology, Biometrics, and Informatics, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany.
Karl Ulrich PetryDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Wolfsburg, Wolfsburg, Germany. k.u.petry@klinikum.wolfsburg.de.
Fraunhofer Project Centre Wolfsburg · DEBerufsverband der Frauenärzte · DEGerman Center for Infection Research · DEMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRandomised controlled trials showed human papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening leads to a significant reduction in cervical cancer incidence compared with cytology-based screening only.

methodsNon-hysterectomised participants ≥30 years underwent co-testing with Papanicolaou (Pap) smear and HR-HPV testing (Hybrid Capture 2; HC2). Women with normal findings had their next screening round after 5 years, and HC2+ and Pap abnormal cases were immediately referred for colposcopy, while cases with discordant findings had repeat testing after 12 months with referral to colposcopy in cases with persistent positive findings.

resultsTwenty-six thousand six hundred and twenty-four women were recruited between February 2006 and December 2016. Two hundred and seventy-four CIN3+ cases were diagnosed (270 HPV+, 4 HPV-), including 31 invasive cervical cancers (29 HPV+, 2 HPV-). No CIN3+ was detected in HPV- women with abnormal cytology. We observed a significant decline in the 5-year incidence of CIN3+ (from 0.96% [95% CI 0.85-1.09%] to 0.16% [95% CI 0.10-0.25%]; p < 0.0001) and cervical cancer (from 0.10% [95% CI 0.07%-0.15%] to 0.025% [95% CI 0.01-0.08%]; p = 0.01) between the first and subsequent rounds. Approximately 90% (246/274) of CIN3+ cases were diagnosed at first colposcopy.

conclusionsThe decline in disease rates with 5-yearly co-testing seems mainly attributable to HPV testing since no CIN3+ occurred in HPV-/Pap+ women.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerAdultCervix UteriColposcopyFemaleGermanyHumansMiddle AgedPapanicolaou TestPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsPregnancyUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginal Smears

Identifiers

PMID30988395
PMCPMC6734660
OpenAlexW2936710467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.