Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30987685›Full record

Trial reportBMC research notes2019

The trials and tribulations of conducting an m-health pilot randomized controlled trial to improve oral cancer therapy adherence: recommendations for future multisite, non-drug clinical trials.

Lahiru Russell, Michaela C Pascoe, John F Seymour, Sanchia Aranda, Phyllis Butow, Karla Gough, Penelope Schofield

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC research notes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Supportive care in cancer-a MASCC perspective.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Lahiru RussellSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Michaela C PascoeInstitute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living, Victoria University, Footscray, VIC, Australia.
John F SeymourPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Sanchia ArandaUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Phyllis ButowDepartment of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Karla GoughPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Penelope SchofieldPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Parkville, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. pschofield@swin.edu.au.
University of Melbourne · AUCancer Council Australia · AUDeakin University · AUPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUUniversity of Sydney · AUVictoria University · AU

Funding

Australiasian Lymphoma and Leukaemia Group ALLG SC04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIntegrating mobile phone-based health (m-health) interventions into healthcare systems is one solution to improve access to services for the growing number of patients with chronic illness. Practical challenges such as poor recruitment and inadequate resource allocation can hamper the assessment of such interventions with clinical trial methodology. This paper highlights the challenges encountered during a pilot randomized controlled trial of an m-health medication adherence intervention and offers recommendations for future multi-site, non-drug clinical trials.

resultsEighteen patients were recruited to the study; eight were randomly allocated to the intervention arm. Intervention participants responded to their daily medication-reminder text messages, indicating that medication had been taken or not, and nurses were able to organize their calls around their workload. The trial closed prematurely primarily due to inadequate numbers of eligible patients; however, other potentially resolvable feasibility issues were identified. These included lack of infrastructure at study sites, poor screening data acquisition and management processes, and inexperience in conducting supportive care trials at participating sites. M-health intervention trials are designed to inform implementation of best supportive care practice. Adequate skills and infrastructure are research prerequisites that require careful consideration and sufficient investment for the successful execution of multi-site supportive care trials. Trial registration Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Register: ACTRN12612000635864.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringEarly Termination of Clinical TrialsAntineoplastic AgentsAustraliaHumansMouth NeoplasmsPatient SelectionPilot ProjectsTelemedicineText MessagingAntineoplastic AgentsChronic myeloid leukemiaFeasibilitym-healthSupportive care trials

Identifiers

PMID30987685
PMCPMC6466650
OpenAlexW2939416019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.