Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30987599›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2019

Phenotypic and genetic characterization of tomato mutants provides new insights into leaf development and its relationship to agronomic traits.

Marybel Jáquez-Gutiérrez, Alejandro Atarés, Benito Pineda, Pilar Angarita, Carlos Ribelles, Begoña García-Sogo, Jorge Sánchez-López, Carmen Capel, Fernando J Yuste-Lisbona, Rafael Lozano and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Marybel Jáquez-GutiérrezInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas (IBMCP), Universitat Politècnica de València - Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Ingeniero Fausto Elio s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
Alejandro AtarésInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas (IBMCP), Universitat Politècnica de València - Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Ingeniero Fausto Elio s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
Benito PinedaInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas (IBMCP), Universitat Politècnica de València - Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Ingeniero Fausto Elio s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
Pilar AngaritaInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas (IBMCP), Universitat Politècnica de València - Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Ingeniero Fausto Elio s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
Carlos RibellesInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas (IBMCP), Universitat Politècnica de València - Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Ingeniero Fausto Elio s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
Begoña García-SogoInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas (IBMCP), Universitat Politècnica de València - Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Ingeniero Fausto Elio s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
Jorge Sánchez-LópezInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas (IBMCP), Universitat Politècnica de València - Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Ingeniero Fausto Elio s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain.
Carmen CapelCentro de Investigación en Biotecnología Agroalimentaria (BITAL), Universidad de Almería, 04120, Almería, Spain.
Fernando J Yuste-LisbonaCentro de Investigación en Biotecnología Agroalimentaria (BITAL), Universidad de Almería, 04120, Almería, Spain.
Rafael LozanoCentro de Investigación en Biotecnología Agroalimentaria (BITAL), Universidad de Almería, 04120, Almería, Spain.
Vicente MorenoInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas (IBMCP), Universitat Politècnica de València - Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Ingeniero Fausto Elio s/n, 46022, Valencia, Spain. vmoreno@ibmcp.upv.es.
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESInstituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Plantas · ESUniversity of Almería · ESAutonomous University of Sinaloa · MXUniversidad Cooperativa de Colombia · CO

Funding

CONACYT PhD fellowshipMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad AGL2015-64991-C3-1-RMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad AGL2015-64991-C3-3-RMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad BES-2013-063778
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTomato mutants altered in leaf morphology are usually identified in the greenhouse, which demands considerable time and space and can only be performed in adequate periods. For a faster but equally reliable scrutiny method we addressed the screening in vitro of 971 T-DNA lines. Leaf development was evaluated in vitro in seedlings and shoot-derived axenic plants. New mutants were characterized in the greenhouse to establish the relationship between in vitro and in vivo leaf morphology, and to shed light on possible links between leaf development and agronomic traits, a promising field in which much remains to be discovered.

resultsFollowing the screening in vitro of tomato T-DNA lines, putative mutants altered in leaf morphology were evaluated in the greenhouse. The comparison of results in both conditions indicated a general phenotypic correspondence, showing that in vitro culture is a reliable system for finding mutants altered in leaf development. Apart from providing homogeneous conditions, the main advantage of screening in vitro lies in the enormous time and space saving. Studies on the association between phenotype and nptII gene expression showed co-segregation in two lines (P > 99%). The use of an enhancer trap also allowed identifying gain-of-function mutants through reporter expression analysis. These studies suggested that genes altered in three other mutants were T-DNA tagged. New mutants putatively altered in brassinosteroid synthesis or perception, mutations determining multiple pleiotropic effects, lines affected in organ curvature, and the first tomato mutant with helical growth were discovered. Results also revealed new possible links between leaf development and agronomic traits, such as axillary branching, flower abscission, fruit development and fruit cracking. Furthermore, we found that the gene tagged in mutant 2635-MM encodes a Sterol 3-beta-glucosyltransferase. Expression analysis suggested that abnormal leaf development might be due to the lack-off-function of this gene.

conclusionIn vitro culture is a quick, efficient and reliable tool for identifying tomato mutants altered in leaf morphology. The characterization of new mutants in vivo revealed new links between leaf development and some agronomic traits. Moreover, the possible implication of a gene encoding a Sterol 3-beta-glucosyltransferase in tomato leaf development is reported.

Indexed as

FlowersFruitGlucosyltransferasesMutationPhenotypePlant LeavesPlant ProteinsSolanum lycopersicumGlucosyltransferasesPlant Proteinssterol 3-beta-glucosyltransferaseAbscissionFruit developmentHelical growthLeaf developmentMutantsOrgan curvatureScreening in vitroT-DNA linesTomato

Identifiers

PMID30987599
PMCPMC6466659
OpenAlexW2946435109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.