ArticleBMC plant biology2019
Comparative analysis of miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) and long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons in six Citrus species.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evolutionary Study of Transposable Elements: Structural Characterization and Phylogenomic Profiling in Plant Genomes.Journal of molecular evolution · 2026Review
- A Super-Pangenome for Cultivated Citrus Reveals Evolutive Features During the Allopatric Phase of Their Reticulate Evolution.Plant biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- MITE Annotation and Landscape in 207 Plant Genomes Reveal Their Evolutionary Dynamics and Functional Roles.Molecular ecology resources · 2025Article
- Exploring the genomic landscape of mites and harnessing MITE insertion polymorphism markers in jute (Corchorus sp.).Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Divergent landscapes and evolutionary trajectories of 5S rDNA and Cassandra retroelement in Saccharinae.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Transposable elements drive evolution and perturb gene expression in Brassica rapa and B. oleracea.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Construction of a comprehensive library of repeated sequences for the annotation of Citrus genomes.BMC genomic data · 2025Article
- Exploration on cold adaptation of Antarctic lichen via detection of positive selection genes.IMA fungus · 2024Article
- Genome-wide characterization and evolution analysis of miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements in Barley (Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Lineage-specific amplification and epigenetic regulation of LTR-retrotransposons contribute to the structure, evolution, and function of Fabaceae species.BMC genomics · 2023Article
- Genome-wide characterization of long terminal repeat retrotransposons provides insights into trait evolution of four cucurbit species.Functional & integrative genomics · 2023Article
- Non-Coding RNAs in Tuberculosis Epidemiology: Platforms and Approaches for Investigating the Genome's Dark Matter.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Genome size evolution in the beetle genus Diabrotica.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Pangenome-wide analysis of cyclic nucleotide-gated channel (CNGC) gene family in citrusFrontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Molecular fossils illuminate the evolution of retroviruses following a macroevolutionary transition from land to water.PLoS pathogens · 2021Article
- Pan-genome: A promising resource for noncoding RNA discovery in plants.The plant genome · 2020Review
- Miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs), derived insertional polymorphism as a tool of marker systems for molecular plant breeding.Molecular biology reports · 2020Review
- Identification of Transposable Elements in Conifer and Their Potential Application in Breeding.Evolutionary bioinformatics online · 2020Article
- Becoming a Selfish Clan: Recombination Associated to Reverse-Transcription in LTR Retrotransposons.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMiniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) and long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are ubiquitous in plants genomes, and highly important in their evolution and diversity. However, their mechanisms of insertion/amplification and roles in Citrus genome's evolution/diversity are still poorly understood.
resultsTo address this knowledge gap, we developed different computational pipelines to analyze, annotate and classify MITEs and LTR retrotransposons in six different sequenced Citrus species. We identified 62,010 full-length MITEs from 110 distinguished families. We observed MITEs tend to insert in gene related regions and enriched in promoters. We found that DTM63 is possibly an active Mutator-like MITE family in the traceable past and may still be active in Citrus. The insertion of MITEs resulted in massive polymorphisms and played an important role in Citrus genome diversity and gene structure variations. In addition, 6630 complete LTR retrotransposons and 13,371 solo-LTRs were identified. Among them, 12 LTR lineages separated before the differentiation of mono- and dicotyledonous plants. We observed insertion and deletion of LTR retrotransposons was accomplished with a dynamic balance, and their half-life in Citrus was ~ 1.8 million years.
conclusionsThese findings provide insights into MITEs and LTR retrotransposons and their roles in genome diversity in different Citrus genomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.