Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30987036›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2019

Individual Immune-Modulatory Capabilities of MSC-Derived Extracellular Vesicle (EV) Preparations and Recipient-Dependent Responsiveness.

Lambros Kordelas, Esther Schwich, Robin Dittrich, Peter A Horn, Dietrich W Beelen, Verena Börger, Bernd Giebel, Vera Rebmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. The Role of MSCs and Cell Fusion in Tissue Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lambros KordelasDepartment of Bone Marrow Transplantation, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany. Lambros.Kordelas@uk-essen.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3116-473X
Esther SchwichInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany. Esther.Schwich@uk-essen.de.
Robin DittrichInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany. Robin.Dittrich@uk-essen.de.
Peter A HornInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany. Peter.Horn@uk-essen.de.
Dietrich W BeelenDepartment of Bone Marrow Transplantation, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany. Dietrich.Beelen@uk-essen.de.
Verena BörgerInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany. Verena.Boerger@uk-essen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8230-2218
Bernd GiebelInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany. Bernd.Giebel@uk-essen.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2446-948X
Vera RebmannInstitute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany. Vera.Rebmann@uk-essen.de.ORCID 0000-0003-4660-3870
Essen University Hospital · DE

Funding

LeitmarktAgentur.NRW and the European Union EFRE-0800396
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment with extracellular vesicles (EVs) derived from mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) have been suggested as novel therapeutic option in acute inflammation-associated disorders due to their immune-modulatory capacities. As we have previously observed differences in the cytokine profile of independent MSC-EV preparations, functional differences of MSC-EV preparations have to be considered. To evaluate the immune-modulatory capabilities of specific MSC-EV preparations, reliable assays are required to characterize the functionality of MSC-EV preparations prior to administration to a patient. To this end, we established an in vitro assay evaluating the immune-modulatory capacities of MSC-EV preparations. Here, we compared the efficacy of four independent MSC-EV preparations to modulate the induction of T cell differentiation and cytokine production after phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA)/Ionomycin stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) derived from six healthy donors. Flow cytometric analyses revealed that the four MSC-EV preparations differentially modulate the expression of surface markers, such as CD45RA, on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, resulting in shifts in the frequencies of effector and effector memory T cells. Moreover, cytokine profile in T cell subsets was affected in a MSC-EV-specific manner exclusively in CD8+ naïve T cells. Strikingly, hierarchical clustering revealed that the T cell response towards the MSC-EV preparations largely varied among the different PBMC donors. Thus, besides defining functional activity of MSC-EV preparations, it will be crucial to test whether patients intended for treatment with MSC-EV preparations are in principal competent to respond to the envisioned MSC-EV therapy.

Indexed as

ImmunomodulationCell DifferentiationCluster AnalysisCytokinesExtracellular VesiclesHumansIonomycinLeukocyte Common AntigensMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationTetradecanoylphorbol AcetateT-LymphocytesCytokinesIonomycinLeukocyte Common AntigensTetradecanoylphorbol Acetateextracellular vesicles (EV)Graft-versus-Host-Disease (GvHD)mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSC)

Identifiers

PMID30987036
PMCPMC6479947
OpenAlexW2928833228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.