Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30986991›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Review of Methodologies for Assessing Sustainable Diets and Potential for Development of Harmonised Indicators.

Paul Eze Eme, Jeroen Douwes, Nicholas Kim, Sunia Foliaki, Barbara Burlingame

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. RawJournal of food composition and analysis : an official publication of the United Nations University, International Network of Food Data Systems · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paul Eze EmeSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health Science, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand. p.eme@massey.ac.nz.
Jeroen DouwesCentre of Public Health Research, Massey University, Wellington 6140, New Zealand. j.douwes@massey.ac.nz.
Nicholas KimSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health Science, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand. n.kim@massey.ac.nz.
Sunia FoliakiCentre of Public Health Research, Massey University, Wellington 6140, New Zealand. s.foliaki@massey.ac.nz.
Barbara BurlingameSchool of Health Sciences, College of Health Science, Massey University, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand. b.burlingame@massey.ac.nz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The underlying values and priorities that drive policy responses depend largely on the constructs that researchers and decision makers select to measure and the metrics used. Despite much recent attention being given to sustainable diets and food systems and to the importance of clearly measuring sustainability to meet targets, to achieve goals, and to appraise dietary and environmental policies, it is not commonly agreed how the different indicators of sustainable diets are assessed. The evidence base for assessment of these indicators are frequently weak, fragmented, and arbitrary. The aim of this paper was to compare a range of published methods and indicators for assessing sustainable diets and food systems in order to harmonise them. Keyword and reference searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, CAB Abstracts, and Web of Knowledge. Fifty-two studies (21 proposed methods and 31 used methods) that combined environment, nutrition and health, and socioeconomic aspects of sustainable diets were reviewed. The majority (over 90%) of the studies focused on high-income countries. Twenty-eight studies assessed the environmental effects of different dietary practices, eight of the studies examined the nutrition and health indicators used for assessing sustainable food systems, and seven studies assessed the social and economic costs of diets. A classification of the elements was developed, and common elements are proposed for standardizing. These elements were categorized into nutrition and health indicators, environment indicators, and socioeconomic indicators. Standardized or harmonized indicators can be used for consistency and applicability purposes and to support, implement, and monitor relevant policies.

Indexed as

Environmental PolicyConservation of Natural ResourcesDietFood SupplyHumansSocioeconomic Factorseconomicfood systemshealthindicatorsnutritionsustainable diets

Identifiers

PMID30986991
PMCPMC6479933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.