Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30986987›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2019

Rearing Undocked Pigs on Fully Slatted Floors Using Multiple Types and Variations of Enrichment.

Jen-Yun Chou, Constance M V Drique, Dale A Sandercock, Rick B D'Eath, Keelin O'Driscoll

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Review of the Effects of Non-Straw Enrichment on Tail Biting in Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jen-Yun ChouPig Development Department, Teagasc, P61 P302 Moorepark, Ireland. jenyun.chou@ed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7537-2528
Constance M V DriqueAgrocampus Ouest, 35042 Rennes, France. constance.drique@agrocampus-ouest.fr.
Dale A SandercockAnimal & Veterinary Sciences Research Group, SRUC, Roslin Institute Building, Easter Bush, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK. dale.sandercock@sruc.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1519-9206
Rick B D'EathAnimal & Veterinary Sciences Research Group, SRUC, Roslin Institute Building, Easter Bush, Midlothian EH25 9RG, UK. rick.death@sruc.ac.uk.
Keelin O'DriscollPig Development Department, Teagasc, P61 P302 Moorepark, Ireland. keelin.odriscoll@teagasc.ie.ORCID 0000-0003-0944-3732

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In fully slatted systems, tail biting is difficult to manage when pigs' tails are not docked because loose enrichment material can obstruct slurry systems. This pilot study sought to determine: a) whether intact-tailed pigs can be reared with a manageable level of tail biting by using multiple slat-compatible enrichment; b) whether a variation of enrichment has an effect; and c) whether pigs show a preference in enrichment use. Ninety-six undocked pigs were given the same enrichment items from one week after birth until weaning. At weaning, four different combinations of 8 enrichment items were utilized based on predefined characteristics. These were randomly assigned to 8 pens (

Indexed as

environmental enrichmentpigslatted systemtail biting

Identifiers

PMID30986987
PMCPMC6523089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.