Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30986398›Full record

ReviewExperimental neurology2019

Understanding the axonal response to injury by in vivo imaging in the mouse spinal cord: A tale of two branches.

Binhai Zheng, Ariana O Lorenzana, Le Ma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Neural regeneration research · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Regulation of axonal regeneration after mammalian spinal cord injury.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Binhai ZhengDepartment of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA. Electronic address: binhai@ucsd.edu.
Ariana O LorenzanaDepartment of Neurosciences, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Le MaDepartment of Neuroscience, Jefferson Synaptic Biology Center, Vickie and Jack Farber Institute for Neuroscience, Sydney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

U of Calif, San Diego Neuroscience Microscopy ImagingP30NS047101 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GLEESON, JOSEPH G, ZHENG, BINHAI · 2003 to 2022
$9.0M
The Role of a Pair of MAP3Ks in the Multicellular Response to Spinal Cord InjuryR01NS093055 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ZHENG, BINHAI · 2015 to 2024
$4.0M
Molecular Mechanisms of Axon Branching in Synaptic DevelopmentR01NS062047 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI MA, LE · 2009 to 2018
$3.4M
Genetic analysis of myelin inhibitors and PTEN in injury-inducedCNS axon growthR01NS054734 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ZHENG, BINHAI · 2007 to 2015
$3.2M
Dynamics of axon regeneration with in vivo imaging and conventional injury modelsF31NS074867 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LORENZANA, ARIANA · 2011 to 2013
$73k
Harnessing Corticospinal Axon Sprouting for Functional Recovery in Chronic InjuryI01RX002483 · VA · VA SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI ZHENG, BINHAI · 2019 to 2023
–
NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS074867NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS047101NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS054734NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS062047NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS093055RRD VA I01 RX002483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the basic properties of how axons respond to injury in the mammalian central nervous system (CNS) is of fundamental value for developing strategies to promote neural repair. Axons possess complex morphologies with stereotypical branching patterns. However, current knowledge of the axonal response to injury gives little consideration to axonal branches, nor do strategies to promote axon regeneration. This article reviews evidence from in vivo spinal cord imaging that axonal branches markedly impact the degenerative and regenerative responses to injury. At a major bifurcation point, depending on whether one or both axonal branches are injured, neurons may choose either a more self-preservative response or a more dynamic response. The stabilizing effect of the spared branch may underlie a well-known divergence in neuronal responses to injury, and illustrates an example where in vivo spinal cord imaging reveals insights that are difficult to elucidate with conventional histological methods.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsMiceNerve RegenerationNeuroimagingOptical ImagingSpinal Cord Injuries2-photon microscopyAxonal branchesAxon degenerationAxon regenerationBifurcationIn vivo imagingNeuronal responses to axonal injurySpinal cord

Identifiers

PMID30986398
PMCPMC6588497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.