Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30986394›Full record

Observational studyThe American journal of medicine2019

Utility of Blood Cultures in Pneumonia.

David Zhang, Danny Yang, Anil N Makam

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The American journal of medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Antibiotic de-escalation patterns and outcomes in critically ill patients with suspected pneumonia as informed by bronchoalveolar lavage results.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Plasma Microbial Cell-Free DNA Sequencing in Immunocompromised Patients With Pneumonia: A Prospective Observational Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David ZhangDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Danny YangDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Anil N MakamDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; Division of Hospital Medicine, Chan Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California.
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USSan Francisco General Hospital · US

Funding

Post-Acute Care in the Elderly: the Role of Long-Term Acute Care HospitalsK23AG052603 · NIA · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MAKAM, ANIL NAGA · 2016 to 2021
$1.1M
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG052603
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBlood cultures are of limited utility in nonsevere community-acquired pneumonia, though routinely recommended for severe community-acquired pneumonia or health care-associated pneumonia due to perceived greater bacteremia risk, particularly with multidrug-resistant organisms. The utility of this practice is unknown.

methodsIn this observational cohort study, we abstracted data from medical records for consecutive hospitalizations for pneumonia by adults to an academic medical center from 2014-2015. The primary outcomes included bacteremia, multidrug-resistant organism bacteremia, and appropriate management changes attributed to culture results, stratified by pneumonia classification (nonsevere community-acquired pneumonia, severe community-acquired pneumonia, or health care-associated pneumonia) and likelihood the bacteremia was due to pneumonia vs another infection. We assessed the diagnostic test performance of one or more guideline-defined risk factors for bacteremia in nonsevere community-acquired pneumonia, for whom cultures are routinely recommended.

resultsOf 456 pneumonia hospitalizations, 30 (6.6%) had bacteremia, with a greater incidence in severe community-acquired pneumonia (14.7%) than nonsevere community-acquired pneumonia (7.8%) and health care-associated pneumonia (6.6%; P = .12). Seventeen bacteremia cases were likely due to pneumonia (3.7%). Only 2 (0.4%) had multidrug-resistant organisms (both health care-associated pneumonia), one of whom was due to pneumonia. Appropriate management changes occurred in 8 cases (1.8%; 7 de-escalation and 1 escalation of antibiotics); only 1 with bacteremia likely due to pneumonia (de-escalation). The one case of appropriate antibiotic escalation occurred in a patient with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus unrelated to pneumonia. Having one or more guideline-defined risk factors did not identify bacteremia in nonsevere community-acquired pneumonia (positive likelihood ratio, 1.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-1.99).

conclusionRoutine blood cultures in pneumonia have extremely low yield and utility irrespective of severity and risk.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBlood CultureCohort StudiesFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPneumoniaBlood cultureDiagnostic testGuidelineHospital medicineIncidencePneumonia

Identifiers

PMID30986394
PMCPMC6790142
OpenAlexW2937244116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.