Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30986359›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of sports medicine2019

Predictors of Healing Ligament Size and Magnetic Resonance Signal Intensity at 6 Months After Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair.

Martha M Murray, Ata M Kiapour, Leslie A Kalish, Kirsten Ecklund, BEAR Trial Team, Christina Freiberger, Rachael Henderson, Dennis Kramer, Lyle Micheli, Yi-Meng Yen and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of sports medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02664545 (A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial Evaluating the Non-Inferiority of Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02664545 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial Evaluating the Non-Inferiority of Bridge-Enhanced Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair (BEAR) to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With an Autologous Tendon Graft (ACLR)

TypeinterventionalSponsorMiach OrthopaedicsRan2016 to 2028Enrolled100ConditionsAnterior Cruciate Ligament TearArmsBEAR Scaffold, Tendon Graft
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Automated segmentation of the healed anterior cruciate ligament from TJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Martha M MurrayInvestigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ata M KiapourInvestigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Leslie A KalishInvestigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Kirsten EcklundInvestigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
BEAR Trial TeamInvestigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Christina FreibergerInvestigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Rachael HendersonInvestigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Dennis KramerInvestigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Lyle MicheliInvestigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Yi-Meng YenInvestigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Braden C FlemingInvestigation performed at Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Pilot Projects ProgramP30GM122732 · NIGMS · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL · PI CHEN, QIAN · 2017 to 2021
$6.6M
Biologically Enhanced Healing of Autograft ACL Reconstruction.R01AR056834 · NIAMS · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL · PI FLEMING, BRADEN C, MURRAY, MARTHA M · 2009 to 2017
$5.8M
Non-invasive Assessment of Ligament Healing, in VivoR01AR065462 · NIAMS · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL · PI FLEMING, BRADEN C, MURRAY, MARTHA M · 2014 to 2016
$2.1M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056834NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR065462NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM122732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) augmented with a tissue engineered scaffold to facilitate ligament healing is a technique under development for patients with ACL injuries. The size (the amount of tissue) and signal intensity (the quality of tissue) of the healing ligament as visualized on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have been shown to be related to its strength in large animal models. HYPOTHESIS: Both modifiable and nonmodifiable risk factors could influence the size and signal intensity of the repaired ligament in patients at 6 months after surgery. STUDY

designCase series; Level of evidence, 4.

methods62 patients (mean age, 19.4 years; range, 14-35 years) underwent MRI of the knee 6 months after ACL repair augmented with an extracellular matrix scaffold. The signal intensity (normalized to cortical bone) and average cross-sectional area of the healing ligament were measured from the MRI stack obtained by use of a gradient echo sequence. Associations between these 2 measures and patient characteristics, which included demographic, clinical, and anatomic features, were determined by use of multivariable regression analysis.

resultsA larger cross-sectional area of the repaired ligament at 6 months was associated with male sex, older age, and the performance of a larger notchplasty ( P < .05 for all associations). A lower signal intensity at 6 months, indicating greater similarity to normal ligament, was associated with a smaller tibial slope and greater side-to-side difference in quadriceps strength 3 months after surgery. Other factors, including preoperative body mass index, mechanism of injury, tibial stump length, and Marx activity score, were not significantly associated with either MRI parameter at 6 months.

conclusionModifiable factors, including surgical notchplasty and slower recovery of quadriceps strength at 3 months, were associated with a larger cross-sectional area and improved signal intensity of the healing ACL after bridge-enhanced ACL repair in this preliminary study. Further studies to determine the optimal size of the notchplasty and the most effective postoperative rehabilitation strategy after ACL repair augmented by a scaffold are justified. REGISTRATION: NCT02664545 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultAnimalsAnterior Cruciate LigamentAnterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKnee JointMaleMuscle StrengthQuadriceps MuscleRisk FactorsTibiaACLbiomechanicsMRIoutcomerepairresearch

Identifiers

PMID30986359
PMCPMC6497549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.