Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30986325›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2019

Opportunities for collaboration between pharmacists and clinical pharmacologists to support medicines optimisation in the UK.

Nina L Barnett

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nina L BarnettLondon North West Healthcare NHS trust and NHS Specialist Pharmacy Service, Visiting professor, Kingston University, London, England.ORCID 0000-0003-3610-4816
London North West Healthcare NHS Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medicines optimisation is a clinician-driven, person-centred ongoing process. Pharmacists and clinical pharmacologists have medicines-related expertise to deliver medication review which optimises clinical and cost-effective use of medication, aligned with patient preferences, contributing to improved health outcomes. There is a large pharmacy workforce, directly accessible to patients, who can provide expert medicines-related care on the high street, and increasingly in general practice and care homes settings. There are a small number of clinical pharmacologists in practice, mainly working in a hospital setting. Potential opportunities for collaboration are extensive, including local initiatives in collaborative education, formulary/medicines management, electronic prescribing, service evaluation, research, direct clinical services as well as strategic planning through the Regional Medicines Optimisation Committees. Pharmacists and clinical pharmacologists have complementary skill sets and through acknowledging the differences in their approaches and valuing their unique skills, health services can ensure that patients are signposted to appropriate services.

Indexed as

Intersectoral CollaborationHealth WorkforceHumansMedication Therapy ManagementPharmacistsPharmacology, ClinicalPharmacy Service, HospitalUnited Kingdomclinical pharmacologyclinical pharmacypharmacypolypharmacyprescribing

Identifiers

PMID30986325
PMCPMC6624380
OpenAlexW2938074007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.