Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30986273›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Prevalence of kdr mutations and insecticide susceptibility among natural population of Aedes aegypti in West Bengal.

Pabitra Saha, Moytrey Chatterjee, Sudeep Ballav, Akash Chowdhury, Nandita Basu, Ardhendu Kumar Maji

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Worldwide Status of Insecticide Resistance ofJournal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Updating the Insecticide Resistance Status ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Knockdown resistance mutations distribution and characteristics ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pabitra SahaDepartment of Microbiology, Calcutta School of Tropical Medicine, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Moytrey ChatterjeeDepartment of Microbiology, Calcutta School of Tropical Medicine, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Sudeep BallavDepartment of Microbiology, Calcutta School of Tropical Medicine, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Akash ChowdhuryDepartment of Zoology, A. P. C. Roy Govt. College, Himachal Bihar, Matigara, Siliguri, West Bengal, India.
Nandita BasuDepartment of Pathology, Jagannath Gupta Institute of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Budge Budge, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Ardhendu Kumar MajiDepartment of Microbiology, Calcutta School of Tropical Medicine, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Budge Budge Institute of Technology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAedes albopictus and Aedes aegypti are the major vectors of arboviral diseases. As effective vaccines are not available for most of the arboviral diseases, vector control by using insecticides play the key role to reduce the disease transmission. The emergence and spread of resistance to different classes of insecticides by the vectors is a major obstacle to control the disease transmission. Information about vector susceptibility to different insecticides and their mechanisms are very important for formulating proper vector control measures. The present study was designed to assess the susceptibility of Ae. aegypti against three different classes of adulticides, one larvicidal agent available and polymorphisms in the voltage-gated sodium channel (VGSC) gene related to insecticide resistance.

methodsImmature stages of Ae. aegypti were collected from three dengue endemic municipal areas of West Bengal and reared in the laboratory. Larvae and adults (F1 progeny) were used for insecticide bioassay as per WHO protocols. Knock down resistance gene (kdr) mutations were assessed by direct sequencing of PCR products.

resultsThe Ae. aegypti population was found to be susceptible to type II pyrethroids and malathion but highly resistant to DDT. A high rate of polymorphisms in the VGSC gene was observed among the collected mosquitoes. A double mutant V1016G + F1534C was found to be associated with DDT resistance but neither V1016G nor F1534C alone showed the same association. Association between the kdr mutations and the susceptibility status of pyrethroids could not be established due to very small sample size. A low to moderate level of resistance was noticed against temephos among the larval population based on WHO criteria.

conclusionThe replacement of DDT by type II pyrethroids for the management of dengue vectors is an appropriate decision taken by the national program which is supported by the findings of a higher level of resistance to DDT. Persistence of polymorphisms in the VGSC gene might be an indication of emergence of resistance against pyrethroid insecticides that should be monitored at a regular interval. Attempts should be made to determine the effectiveness of other larvicides for replacement of temephos if needed in future. Along with the chemical insecticides different biological vector control methods as well as biopesticides should also be used in vector control programmes.

Indexed as

AedesInsect ProteinsMutationVoltage-Gated Sodium ChannelsAnimalsDrug ResistanceIndiaInsecticidesPrevalencePyrethrinsInsecticidesInsect ProteinsPyrethrinsVoltage-Gated Sodium Channels

Identifiers

PMID30986273
PMCPMC6464230
OpenAlexW2939432713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.