Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30986223›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Optimization of the chicken chorioallantoic membrane assay as reliable in vivo model for the analysis of osteosarcoma.

Pierre Kunz, Astrid Schenker, Heiner Sähr, Burkhard Lehner, Jörg Fellenberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Exploring endometriosis through 3DMaterials today. Bio · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Developing a 3D bone model of osteosarcoma to investigate cancer mechanisms and evaluate treatments.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Targeting Bone Tumours with 45S5 Bioactive Glass.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pierre KunzCenter for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Paraplegiology, University of Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Astrid SchenkerClinic for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Catholic Hospital Mainz, Rhineland-Pfalz, Mainz, Germany.
Heiner SährCenter for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Paraplegiology, University of Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Burkhard LehnerCenter for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Paraplegiology, University of Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jörg FellenbergCenter for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Paraplegiology, University of Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6187-6474
Heidelberg University · DECatholic University of Applied Sciences · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Survival rates of osteosarcoma patients could not be significantly improved by conventional chemotherapeutic treatment regimens since the introduction of high-dose chemotherapy 35 years ago. Therefore, there is a strong clinical need for new therapeutic targets and personalized treatment strategies, requiring reliable in vivo model systems for the identification and testing of potential new treatment approaches. Conventional in vivo rodent experiments face ethical issues, are time consuming and costly, being of particular relevance in orphan diseases like osteosarcoma. An attractive alternative to such animal experiments is the chicken chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay. The CAM is a highly vascularized, non-innervated extra-embryonic membrane that is perfectly suited for the engraftment of tumor cells. However, only few reports are available for osteosarcoma and reported data are inconsistent. Therefore, the aim of this study was the adaptation and optimization of the CAM assay for its application in osteosarcoma research. Tumor take rates and volumes of osteosarcoma that developed on the CAM were analyzed after modification of several experimental parameters, including egg windowing, CAM pretreatment, inoculation technique and many more. Eight osteosarcoma cell lines were investigated. Our optimized OS-CAM-assay was finally validated against a rat animal xenograft model. Using the cell line MNNG HOS as reference we could improve the tumor take rates from 51% to 94%, the viability of the embryos from initially 40% to >80% and achieved a threefold increase of the tumor volumes. We were able to generate solid tumors from all eight osteosarcoma cell lines used in this study and could reproduce results that were obtained using an osteosarcoma rat animal model. The CAM assay can bridge the gap between in vitro cell culture and in vivo animal experiments. As reliable in vivo model for osteosarcoma research the optimized CAM assay may speed up preclinical data collection and simplifies research on potential new agents towards personalized treatment strategies. Further, in accordance with Russell's and Burch's "Principles of Humane Experimental Technique" the reasonable use of this model provides a refinement by minimizing pain and suffering of animals and supports a considerable reduction and/or replacement of animal experiments.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsChorioallantoic MembraneNeoplasms, ExperimentalOsteosarcomaAnimalsCell Line, TumorChick EmbryoHumansRatsRats, Nude

Identifiers

PMID30986223
PMCPMC6464229
OpenAlexW2940253979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.