ArticleTurkish thoracic journal2019
Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound in Detecting Causes of Pediatric Chest X-Ray Opacity.
Article in Turkish thoracic journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Point-of-care lung ultrasound in detecting pneumonia: A systematic review.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2024Pooled it
- Role of Thoracic Ultrasound in the Management of Parapneumonic Effusion According to the Proposed Algorithm/Classification in Pediatric Pneumonia: A Single Center Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Pulmonary Invasive Fungal Disease: Ultrasound and Computed Tomography Scan Findings.Thoracic research and practice · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesComputed tomography is considered as the diagnostic gold standard for following up the majority of pediatric chest X-ray (CXR) opacities. However, radiation, cost, and waiting times have led to search for diagnostic alternatives. This study was conducted to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the ultrasound (US) in detecting the causes of pediatric CXR opacities. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study was conducted on the pediatric patients with CXR opacity referring to Dr. Sheikh Hospital in Mashhad, Iran during 2016-2017. After undergoing the US exam, the patients were followed to obtain the final diagnosis based on reference standard (RF). The accuracy of the US was calculated in detection of thoracic lesions. P value <0.05 was considered to be significant.
resultsThe most common diagnostic cause of CXR opacity based on RF was pneumonia (n=46, 35-38%), thymus (n=37, 28-46%), bone and soft tissue mass (n=12, 9.23%), cystic lesions (n=11, 8.46%), and diaphragmatic lesions (n=10, 7.69%), as well as intrathoracic masses and empyema (n=7, 5.38%). In only four patients (3.07%), the final diagnosis based on RF was inconsistent with the US diagnosis. The diagnostic accuracy of the US was 100% in the diagnosis of bone and soft tissue masses, diaphragmatic lesions, empyema, and normal thymus, and the accuracy was 96.92% for pneumonia, and 99.23% for cystic lesions and intrathoracic masses.
conclusionRegarding the assessed diagnostic accuracy, the US can be a reliable diagnostic tool to differentiate the main cause of pediatric CXR opacity.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.