ArticleTurkish thoracic journal2019
What Factors Influence Non-Adherence to the Smoking Cessation Program?
Article in Turkish thoracic journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engaging Patients in Smoking Cessation Treatment within the Lung Cancer Screening Setting: Lessons Learned from an NCI SCALE Trial.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Trial
- Comparative assessment of outcomes of smoking cessation therapies and role of free medications in successful long-term abstinence.Tobacco induced diseases · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo improve our knowledge and understand how to deal with non-adherence to the support programs and to determine the rate and possible factors related to non-adherence in subjects who attended our smoking cessation clinic. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis was a case-control study that included 550 subjects who applied to our smoking cessation clinic between June 1, 2011 and December 31, 2011. After a 1-year follow-up period, subjects were divided into two groups: adherent (controls) and non-adherent (cases). Sociodemographic and clinical parameters and smoking habits were evaluated. A p value <0.05 was considered significant.
resultsOf the 550 subjects, the number of cases (non-adherent) was 135 (24.6%), and the number of controls (adherent) was 415 (75.4%). Age to begin smoking was significantly young in subjects with non-adherence to the program (p=0.026). The rate of receiving pharmacotherapy was significantly high in subjects with adherence (p<0.0001). No difference was found between the groups according to varenicline, bupropion, nicotine gum, or combined therapy use, whereas nicotine patch use alone significantly increased the rate of non-adherence (p=0.022). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the age to begin smoking (p=0.045, odds ratio (OR): 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86-0.99) and pharmacotherapy (p<0.0001, OR: 5.00, 95% CI: 2.80-8.94) were independent variables that affected adherence to the program.
conclusionCare should be taken in the follow-up period when providing no pharmacotherapy and with subjects who started smoking at a young age.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.